2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2019.04.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new method for cranial vault reconstruction: Augmented reality in synostotic plagiocephaly surgery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Han et al had a comparable outcome 19 and showed that there was no significant difference of intracranial volume between the preoperative model and the actual outcome ( p > 0.05).…”
Section: Outcomes Technical Accuracy Of the Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Han et al had a comparable outcome 19 and showed that there was no significant difference of intracranial volume between the preoperative model and the actual outcome ( p > 0.05).…”
Section: Outcomes Technical Accuracy Of the Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Finally, one article described the operative time of a synostotic plagiocephaly procedure when AR was used. However, they did not compare the result with a control group 19 .…”
Section: Operative Timementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This technology has already demonstrated to improve the accuracy and safety of surgical procedures [55]. Han et al [56] reported the use of AR technology for guidance during open cranial vault reconstructions for the correction of craniosynostosis. Their methodology is based on the attachment of AR markers using occlusal splints for the alignment of virtual models in the AR visualization.…”
Section: Image-guided Surgerymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It uses structured light scanning and sterilizable AR markers attached to the bone surface to ensure accurate alignment of the virtual models in the AR visualization. This methodology presents a significant improvement with respect to previous approaches [56], since the AR markers can be located using structured light scanning and attached near the region of interest to minimize alignment error. This system enables the visualization of the virtual plan overlaid on the surgical field, indicating the planes for bone osteotomy and the target position of remodeled bone fragments (Figure 8).…”
Section: Image-guided Surgerymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10,11 With recent advancements, several systems have been proposed for surgical planning that enable the surgeon to be engaged with both the graphic AR representation and the actual surgical field simultaneously. 7,9,10 Despite the importance of improving the technical skills, attitudes, and interpersonal abilities of those who perform surgical procedures, few studies have examined the use of AR technology in preoperative planning to determine the most favorable surgical approaches. 10 With the development of an AR-based training simulator, surgeons in training can experience realistic simulations of surgical operations comparable to those encountered in actual neurosurgery.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%