Atomistic Simulation of Materials 1989
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4684-5703-2_42
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A New Method for Coupled Elastic-Atomistic Modelling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

2
32
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In one of the earliest works, Kohlhoff and Schmauder [15] and Kohlhoff et al [16] developed a coupled model in which, the finite element analysis was combined with the atomistic model. In this approach, an overlapping domain was defined to enforce the boundary condition on both the atomistic and continuum domains.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In one of the earliest works, Kohlhoff and Schmauder [15] and Kohlhoff et al [16] developed a coupled model in which, the finite element analysis was combined with the atomistic model. In this approach, an overlapping domain was defined to enforce the boundary condition on both the atomistic and continuum domains.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While atomistic models are needed to provide accurate descriptions of defects they are usually too expensive computationally to allow sufficiently large-scale simulations that resolve the elastic far-field, which can, instead, be modelled efficiently by a coarse-grained continuum model. Methodologies for coupling the two different material descriptions were first described in [16,15,24,31]; more recent examples are [1,11,32,14,28]. The numerical analysis of atomistic/continuum hybrid methods is a topic of active research [4, 5, 8, 9, 11, 12, 17-19, 23, 25, 26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By contrast, force-based coupling mechanisms [4,16,15,31] are comparatively simple in their formulation and, more importantly, they do not suffer from the interfacial consistency errors exhibited by most energybased methods [5,23]. The force-based quasicontinuum (QCF) method [4] is a prototypical example of a force-based atomistic/continuum hybrid method and is the focus of the present paper.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although this field has acquired a substantial history, it remains an active area of research. Early work by Kohlhoff and collaborators [7,8] created a methodology that combined finite element analysis with atomistic modeling, named FEAt. The FEAt model uses an atomic lattice surrounded by an FE mesh with a limited overlap region that enforces boundary conditions on both atomistic and continuum domains.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whereas, in a continuum, the free energy is usually the basis for thermoelastic materials since free energy is minimized at equilibrium. 7 Unfortunately, free energy can only be derived from atomistic simulations by complex post-processing based on statistical mechanics. Another issue to consider is what domains in the simulation need atomistic representation and what domains can be represented by continuum and where do they interact: on an interface, over an overlap of finite size or should one region be a (proper) subset the other.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%