2013
DOI: 10.1063/1.4826446
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new method for comparing rankings through complex networks: Model and analysis of competitiveness of major European soccer leagues

Abstract: In this paper we show a new technique to analyze families of rankings. In particular we focus on sports rankings and, more precisely, on soccer leagues. We consider that two teams compete when they change their relative positions in consecutive rankings. This allows to define a graph by linking teams that compete. We show how to use some structural properties of this competitivity graph to measure to what extend the teams in a league compete. These structural properties are the mean degree, the mean strength a… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
41
0
7

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
41
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…. , σ m } contains any tie, then there are no weighted edges in the semi-crossing label, no weighted edges in the long-term-crossing layer and no weighted edges in the tie label of the multiplex evolutive competitivity network of R, so the evolutive competitivity graph defined in [14] corresponds to the projected evolutive competitivity network associated to R with fixed α = 1. These rankings were obtained with a precision threshold ∆ = 0.5 from the family of scores {s 1 , · · · , s 5 } (see Table 2).…”
Section: The Multiplex Evolutive Competitivity Network Associated To mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…. , σ m } contains any tie, then there are no weighted edges in the semi-crossing label, no weighted edges in the long-term-crossing layer and no weighted edges in the tie label of the multiplex evolutive competitivity network of R, so the evolutive competitivity graph defined in [14] corresponds to the projected evolutive competitivity network associated to R with fixed α = 1. These rankings were obtained with a precision threshold ∆ = 0.5 from the family of scores {s 1 , · · · , s 5 } (see Table 2).…”
Section: The Multiplex Evolutive Competitivity Network Associated To mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a recent work (see [11]) we introduced a new method to compare a set of rankings. We based our method on counting crossings but using tools from Complex Networks Analysis, or put in other words, using structural properties of some graphs defined ad hoc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Firstly, we investigate the correlations between node's influence measured by the two methods and F (t) via 25 Kendall's tau coefficient τ [43]. Kendall's tau coefficient τ is widely used for correlation analysis [6,44,45]. The Kendall's 26 tau coefficient considers a set of joint observations from two random variables X and Y .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%