2015
DOI: 10.1117/12.2179017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new method for automatic marking epileptic spike-wave discharges in local field potential signals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1, column "SB"). These results are beyond most methods reported previously [Ovchinnikov et al (2010); Startceva et al (2015); ], though it is not absolutely disastrous for our purpose, because the method is able to detect most event of interest.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 57%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1, column "SB"). These results are beyond most methods reported previously [Ovchinnikov et al (2010); Startceva et al (2015); ], though it is not absolutely disastrous for our purpose, because the method is able to detect most event of interest.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…They explicitly rely on increase of power in certain spectral ranges or indirectly use this fact to improve sensitivity and specificity ]. The exception is some approaches based on predictive models [Startceva et al (2015)]. For reinitiation detection using amplitude dynamics is unacceptable since we assume that a restart often supports discharge, that is, a significant drop in amplitude does not occur or is very short-term.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have developed an XGBoost-based algorithm, Epi-AI, that can generalise to multiple mouse models of both genetic and acquired epilepsies (Models I-III, with sensitivity 91.4%-98.8% on the mouse models used in training), including one not used in the training of the algorithm (Model IV, with sensitivity 76.3%). Previous studies have used only a single model on which to develop a detection approach [9,11,[13][14][15]40], limiting the translation and generalisation of techniques between models or individual users.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A key advantage of the Epi-AI approach is the combination of multiple different mouse models of epilepsy, with differing underlying epileptogenic mechanisms. To the best of our knowledge, none of the previously developed approaches [9,11,[13][14][15]40] have demonstrated that they can detect seizures in multiple mouse models of epilepsy in continuous EEG recordings (table 6). In previous studies, Pan et al [13], Jang et al [14] and Li et al [15] used machine learning approaches to detect seizure events in single mouse models of epilepsy, achieving 76.4% to 99.3% accuracy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%