“…Such compounds can alkylate proteins, DNA, and/or the endogenous antioxidant glutathione (GSH), leading to toxicological outcomes. − Because of the potential safety concerns, electrophilic functional groups (e.g., alkyl halides, Michael acceptors, etc.) are generally avoided in drug design. , Examination of the medicinal chemistry literature, however, reveals several examples of seemingly “chemically inert” compounds, which are prone to nucleophilic displacement by GSH under nonenzymatic (pH 7.4, phosphate buffer, 37 °C) and/or enzymatic conditions. − In the case of enzyme-assisted reactions, GSH conjugation to electrophilic centers is mediated by microsomal, cytosolic and/or mitochondrial glutathione transferases (GST). − From a structure−activity relationship (SAR) perspective, a recurring structural theme in these examples is the presence of the methylsulfone/sulfonamide and/or halide leaving group, which is attached to an electron deficient heteroaromatic ring system (e.g., pyridine, pyridone, benzothiazole, thiadiazole, benzofuran, indole, etc.). The overall displacement mechanism is similar to the one described for GST-catalyzed nucleophilic aromatic substitution reactions and involves nucleophilic attack by the thiolate anion of GSH across the electrophilic center to yield the negatively charged σ-complex or Meisenheimer complex followed by elimination of the appropriate leaving group. − Accordingly, the chemical reactivity of electrophiles with GSH can be governed by steric and/or electronic factors that are predetermined by the nature and position of heteroaromatic substituents.…”