1956
DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9258(18)65129-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A New Metabolic Pathway for a Sulfonamide Group

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1962
1962
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Two reactions appear to compete for transformation of 14: S-glucuronidation and S-methylation (Scheme II). S-Glucuronidation of thiol 14 leads to thioglucuronide 4, a major in vivo metabolite whose formation is well precedented (Larsen and Bakke, 1978;Clapp, 1956).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two reactions appear to compete for transformation of 14: S-glucuronidation and S-methylation (Scheme II). S-Glucuronidation of thiol 14 leads to thioglucuronide 4, a major in vivo metabolite whose formation is well precedented (Larsen and Bakke, 1978;Clapp, 1956).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although sulfonamides are generally considered to be metabolically stable ( , ), FOSA 9 was biotransformed to PFOS 10 in rat liver slices at a low rate, but no biotransformation was observed in microsomal, cytosolic, and 9000 g supernatant fractions. This is apparently the first observation of the metabolic hydrolysis of a sulfonamide.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7,8 Examination of the medicinal chemistry literature, however, reveals several examples of seemingly "chemically inert" compounds, which are prone to nucleophilic displacement by GSH under nonenzymatic (pH 7.4, phosphate buffer, 37 °C) and/or enzymatic conditions. [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18] In the case of enzyme-assisted reactions, GSH conjugation to electrophilic centers is mediated by microsomal, cytosolic and/or mitochondrial glutathione transferases (GST). [19][20][21][22] From a structure-activity relationship (SAR) perspective, a recurring structural theme in these examples is the presence of the methylsulfone/sulfonamide and/or halide leaving group, which is attached to an electron deficient heteroaromatic ring system (e.g., pyridine, pyridone, benzothiazole, thiadiazole, benzofuran, indole, etc.).…”
Section: ' Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such compounds can alkylate proteins, DNA, and/or the endogenous antioxidant glutathione (GSH), leading to toxicological outcomes. Because of the potential safety concerns, electrophilic functional groups (e.g., alkyl halides, Michael acceptors, etc.) are generally avoided in drug design. , Examination of the medicinal chemistry literature, however, reveals several examples of seemingly “chemically inert” compounds, which are prone to nucleophilic displacement by GSH under nonenzymatic (pH 7.4, phosphate buffer, 37 °C) and/or enzymatic conditions. In the case of enzyme-assisted reactions, GSH conjugation to electrophilic centers is mediated by microsomal, cytosolic and/or mitochondrial glutathione transferases (GST). From a structure−activity relationship (SAR) perspective, a recurring structural theme in these examples is the presence of the methylsulfone/sulfonamide and/or halide leaving group, which is attached to an electron deficient heteroaromatic ring system (e.g., pyridine, pyridone, benzothiazole, thiadiazole, benzofuran, indole, etc.). The overall displacement mechanism is similar to the one described for GST-catalyzed nucleophilic aromatic substitution reactions and involves nucleophilic attack by the thiolate anion of GSH across the electrophilic center to yield the negatively charged σ-complex or Meisenheimer complex followed by elimination of the appropriate leaving group. Accordingly, the chemical reactivity of electrophiles with GSH can be governed by steric and/or electronic factors that are predetermined by the nature and position of heteroaromatic substituents.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%