2008
DOI: 10.1007/s10474-007-7041-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new look at some classical theorems on continuous functions on normal spaces

Abstract: A sucient condition for the strict insertion of a continuous function between two comparable upper and lower semicontinuous functions on a normal space is given. Among immediate corollaries are the classical insertion theorems of Michael and Dowker. Our insertion lemma also provides purely topological proofs of some standard results on closed subsets of normal spaces which normally depend upon uniform convergence of series of continuous functions. We also establish a Tietze-type extension theorem characterizin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In [13], there is an insertion lemma holding for normal topologies L = OX with U V iff U ⊆ V . It continues to hold for arbitrary frames with a strong Katětov relation:…”
Section: Definition 31mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In [13], there is an insertion lemma holding for normal topologies L = OX with U V iff U ⊆ V . It continues to hold for arbitrary frames with a strong Katětov relation:…”
Section: Definition 31mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should however be emphasized that both Theorems B and C easily follow from their pointfree versions established in this paper. These versions are corollaries of a rather general insertion lemma related to an arbitrary frame L with a certain extra order which in turn is an abstract version of a result of Gutiérrez García and Kubiak [13] concerning a normal topology OX with U V iff int(X \ U) ∪ V = X . We also establish some natural results regarding perfectly normal frames.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…By Proposition 3.4 (1), ι(0, ϕ G ) # = o(U ) and hence it follows from Proposition 3.5 (3) and Corollary 3.6 (3) that U = F −1 (0, +∞) = (G−F ) −1 (0, +∞). Consequently, 0 < F | U < G| U .…”
Section: Measuring Strict Inequality Between Localic Real Functionsmentioning
confidence: 87%