A majority of the standard texts dealing with proteins portray the peptide link as a mixture of two resonance forms, in one of which the nitrogen atom has a positive charge. As a consequence, it is often believed that the nitrogen atom has a net positive charge. This is in apparent contradiction with the partial negative charge on the nitrogen that is used in force fields for molecular modeling. However, charges on resonance forms are best regarded as formal rather than actual charges and current evidence clearly favors a net negative charge for the nitrogen atom. In the course of the discussion, new ideas about the electronic structure of amides and the peptide bond are presented.Keywords: a-helix; amides; electrostatics; hydrogen bonds; proteins; quantum mechanics This article begins with a listing of some estimates of the partial charges of the atoms of amides. The planarity of amides is typically explained by portraying them as two resonance forms, one of which has a nitrogen atom with a formal positive charge. However, it is chemically unsatisfactory for the nitrogen atom to have a net partial positive charge, and the reasons for this are given. The strongest evidence that the nitrogen is negative rather than positive comes from quantum mechanics. Some recent work on amides and its implications for the electronic structure of the and T orbitals of the CONH group are discussed in some detail. The effect of hydrogen bonding is then considered and, finally, the relevance of these insights for a-helices is addressed.
Point charges on individual atoms:The resonance method used commonly to represent the peptide bond as in Figure 1 is often taken to imply that the nitrogen has a partial positive charge. This conflicts with the partial charges used widely in molecular mechanics force fields for modeling biological molecules. A set of calculated partial charges has been collected (Rogers, 1986), and a