2015
DOI: 10.1037/a0039166
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new look at emotion perception: Concepts speed and shape facial emotion recognition.

Abstract: Decades ago, the "New Look" movement challenged how scientists thought about vision by suggesting that conceptual processes shape visual perceptions. Currently, affective scientists are likewise debating the role of concepts in emotion perception. Here, we utilized a repetition-priming paradigm in conjunction with signal detection and individual difference analyses to examine how providing emotion labels-which correspond to discrete emotion concepts-affects emotion recognition. In Study 1, pairing emotional fa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

9
75
1
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 101 publications
(86 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
9
75
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…First, while emotion theory has long noted top-down contributions to emotion perception (Barrett, 2006; Ochsner et al, 2004), few studies have examined how the categories we use to describe emotion shape emotion themselves (cf. Nook et al, 2015), and fewer still have asked what neural mechanisms underlie such effects. Previous emotion perception studies have focused on the presence vs. absence of emotion language when making a judgment about a stimulus rather than categorical nature of that judgment per se (Gendron et al, 2012; Kassam & Mendes, 2013; Lieberman et al, 2007; Lindquist et al, 2015; Nook et al, 2015; Roberson & Davidoff, 2000).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…First, while emotion theory has long noted top-down contributions to emotion perception (Barrett, 2006; Ochsner et al, 2004), few studies have examined how the categories we use to describe emotion shape emotion themselves (cf. Nook et al, 2015), and fewer still have asked what neural mechanisms underlie such effects. Previous emotion perception studies have focused on the presence vs. absence of emotion language when making a judgment about a stimulus rather than categorical nature of that judgment per se (Gendron et al, 2012; Kassam & Mendes, 2013; Lieberman et al, 2007; Lindquist et al, 2015; Nook et al, 2015; Roberson & Davidoff, 2000).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nook et al, 2015), and fewer still have asked what neural mechanisms underlie such effects. Previous emotion perception studies have focused on the presence vs. absence of emotion language when making a judgment about a stimulus rather than categorical nature of that judgment per se (Gendron et al, 2012; Kassam & Mendes, 2013; Lieberman et al, 2007; Lindquist et al, 2015; Nook et al, 2015; Roberson & Davidoff, 2000). Our study design differed from prior work in that linguistic terms were provided in both conditions and what we varied was the categorical vs. continuous way in which they guided judgments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, emotion perception has been found to require conceptual processing, and is thus open to contextual influences (e.g. visual and social) [52]. Furthermore, recent theoretical developments in the domain of social cognition, emphasising contingent behaviours, suggest that the context of the interaction shapes the individual’s disposition to engage in interaction, resulting in a difficulty in handling out-of-context cues [53].…”
Section: Situated School Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Experimental evidence with perception of emotions would seem to provide additional weight to such a perspective (Nook et al, 2015). This has clear implications for designers of social robot behavior when human perceptions or outcomes are of any degree of importance.…”
Section: A Hypothesis: Social Cue Congruency and Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%