2021
DOI: 10.5194/amt-14-4375-2021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new lidar design for operational atmospheric wind and cloud/aerosol survey from space

Abstract: Abstract. Global wind profile measurement has, for a long time, been a first priority for numerical weather prediction. The demonstration, from ground-based observations, that a double-edge Fabry–Pérot interferometer could be efficiently used for deriving wind profiles from the molecular scattered signal in a very large atmospheric vertical domain has led to the choice of the direct detection technique in space and the selection of the Atmospheric Dynamics Mission (ADM)-Aeolus by the European Space Agency (ESA… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Like for the A2D, the vertical incidence angle, represented by the vertical spot position, is even more crucial for the systematic error of the Aeolus Rayleigh channel, but not architecture and thus makes use of a co-alignment sensor at receiver chain level for ensuring that the emitted laser beam is aligned with the receiver FOV (do Carmo et al, 2021). However, there are also other receiver designs that may be applicable in future spaceborne Doppler wind lidars, e.g., based on Michelson or Mach-Zehnder interferometers (Herbst and Vrancken, 2016;Tucker et al;Baidar et al, 2018;Bruneau and Pelon, 2021), which allow for larger acceptance angles, thus relaxing the requirements on the transmitter-receiver co-alignment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Like for the A2D, the vertical incidence angle, represented by the vertical spot position, is even more crucial for the systematic error of the Aeolus Rayleigh channel, but not architecture and thus makes use of a co-alignment sensor at receiver chain level for ensuring that the emitted laser beam is aligned with the receiver FOV (do Carmo et al, 2021). However, there are also other receiver designs that may be applicable in future spaceborne Doppler wind lidars, e.g., based on Michelson or Mach-Zehnder interferometers (Herbst and Vrancken, 2016;Tucker et al;Baidar et al, 2018;Bruneau and Pelon, 2021), which allow for larger acceptance angles, thus relaxing the requirements on the transmitter-receiver co-alignment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is especially true for the A2D's spaceborne counterpart ALADIN, despite its monostatic design where the transmit and receive path are realized by the same telescope which makes an active co-alignment, as used in the A2D, obsolete. However, the developed retrieval modifications are not applicable to DWLs that rely on other measurement principles, such as Mach-Zehnder interferometers (Baidar et al, 2018;Tucker et al, 2018;Bruneau and Pelon, 2021), particularly as they are generally less sensitive to angular variations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The spatial location of the fringe changes approximately linearly with frequency of the incident light so that a Doppler frequency shift manifests as a spatial displacement of the fringe centroid position. Derivation of the Doppler shift from the broadband Rayleigh-Brillouin backscatter spectrum is achieved by two sequential Fabry-Pérot interferometers (FPIs) that are utilized for applying the double-edge technique (Chanin et al, 1989;Garnier and Chanin, 1992;Flesia and Korb, 1999). The two FPIs act as bandpass filters with adequate width and spacing that are symmetrically placed around the frequency of the emitted laser pulse.…”
Section: Aladin Configuration and Measurement Principlementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A modified ramp-delay-fire technique that was developed for the A2D (Lemmerz et al, 2017) allows for fast responses in the microsecond regime, thus providing high frequency stability (< 4 MHz RMS) even in harsh vibration environments. Referencing on a pulse-by-pulse basis, as performed in other wind lidar instruments (Baidar et al, 2018;Tucker et al, 2018;Bruneau and Pelon, 2021), would relax the requirements in terms of frequency stability. This could, for instance, be realized with avalanche photodiodes (APDs) working in real counting mode.…”
Section: Summary Conclusion and Outlookmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation