2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.knee.2018.09.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new landmark for measuring tibial component rotation after total knee arthroplasty

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Through the personalized alignment method of tibial rotation, the postoperative angle θ was 0.85 ± 1.08 °(the external rotation state of tibial plateau relative to the femoral prosthesis, θ was positive; the relative internal rotation state, θ was negative) was smaller than that of the traditional operation group (7.12 ± 0.99 °).12 months after operation, angle θ of personalized and traditional group were (0.35 ± 1.03) and (6.24 ± 0.69) respectively. The difference between the two groups was statistically signi cant, and the average angle in the traditional positioning group was similar to that reported before [19,20]. And in the study of Kim et al[21], it is proposed that the external rotation of tibial prosthesis is between 2-5 °, and the service life of tibial prosthesis is longer.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Through the personalized alignment method of tibial rotation, the postoperative angle θ was 0.85 ± 1.08 °(the external rotation state of tibial plateau relative to the femoral prosthesis, θ was positive; the relative internal rotation state, θ was negative) was smaller than that of the traditional operation group (7.12 ± 0.99 °).12 months after operation, angle θ of personalized and traditional group were (0.35 ± 1.03) and (6.24 ± 0.69) respectively. The difference between the two groups was statistically signi cant, and the average angle in the traditional positioning group was similar to that reported before [19,20]. And in the study of Kim et al[21], it is proposed that the external rotation of tibial prosthesis is between 2-5 °, and the service life of tibial prosthesis is longer.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Another study by Mahmood et al[ 16 ] introduced a new landmark for measuring tibial component rotation after TKA. This research underscores the importance of identifying reliable anatomical landmarks for component placement, a key aspect that aligns with our study's focus on the detailed measurements of GT.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lateral tibial cortex (LTC), described by Mahmood et al 21 , is a “flat area on the lateral cortex of the tibia inferior to the tibial component…at a depth of approximately 10 mm from the joint line.” This flat area was recreated with use of a sequence of pick points (Fig. 2-B).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of the lack of consensus about tibial component rotation, a number of methods referencing various parts of the tibial tubercle have been described, including the Berger, Mayo, Akagi, and Insall methods 11,17,18 . Non-tuberclereferencing markers of rotation have been described as well, including the posterior condylar axis (PCA), anterior condylar axis (ACA), and the lateral tibial crest [19][20][21] . The Cobb axis method 22 , which entails finding the centers of the best-fit circles of the medial and lateral tibial condyles, is another method that forms the basis for the concept of placing the tibial baseplate to best fit the proximal part of the tibia.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%