2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2022.118439
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new intrusion detection system based on Moth–Flame Optimizer algorithm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In recent years, a new direction was utilized for the IDS by employing the power of the metaheuristic optimization algorithms adopted in different and complex engineering and optimization problems, including IDS. For example, Alazab et al [12] employed the moth-flame optimizer algorithm to build an IDS method. The MFO was a feature selection method that enhanced the classifier's performance (Decision Tree).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, a new direction was utilized for the IDS by employing the power of the metaheuristic optimization algorithms adopted in different and complex engineering and optimization problems, including IDS. For example, Alazab et al [12] employed the moth-flame optimizer algorithm to build an IDS method. The MFO was a feature selection method that enhanced the classifier's performance (Decision Tree).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study used the ratio of 70:30 for the training and the testing [51]. The 30% testing dataset is then passed into the proposed classi ers which are DT and KNN after which they classify the dataset into normal or anomalies [52,53]. Performance evaluation is conducted for the classi ers using the confusion matrix values to get the values for the performance metrics which include, accuracy, detection rate, precision, FPR, and so on.…”
Section: Proposed Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For training and assessment, this study used a 70:30 ratio [51]. The proposed classifier, DT and KNN, are then fed the 30% test dataset, and they categorise the set of data as normal or anomalous [52,53]. In order to recalculate the values for performance indicators like correctness, greater accuracy, and other performance metrics, the co -variance values are employed in the measuring performance of the classifiers.…”
Section: Proposed Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%