A New Instrument for Measuring Dietary Knowledge in Patients With Diabetes: Psychometric Testing of the CoNOCidiet‐Diabetes

Romero‐Sánchez, José Manuel; Brito, Pedro Ruymán Brito; Martínez-Alberto, Carlos Enrique; Martín‐García, Ángel; Rodríguez-Álvaro, Martín; Paloma‐Castro, Olga

doi:10.1111/2047-3095.12288

Cited by 5 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 23 publications

(26 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The Spearman-Brown correlation coefficient showed a strong positive correlation (0.91) between the CEECCA scores and the NOC indicator assessment scores for the whole sample. A study on the psychometric properties of an instrument (CoNOCidietDiabetes) [25], whose design and validation used the NOC classification, also obtained better levels of correlation between the total scores of the two instruments (r s = 0.72; p-value = 0.001) than between the individual correlations for each NOC indicator, where 41% of correlations were rated as weak and only 9.1% were rated as moderate. Other studies on the design and validation of instruments based on the NOC indicators obtained values similar to those obtained in this study when comparing the results for the whole sample using conceptually similar instruments as a reference.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 93%

“…In our opinion, the time constraints and operational limitations of the study, together with the difficulty in recruiting participants with this clinical and neuropsychological profile, have prevented a larger sample size from being recruited. Other nursing assessment instruments based on the NANDA-I and NOC classifications have been validated using larger sample sizes [24,25,42]. However, sample sizes are notably smaller in several validation studies of screening-type instruments for the diagnosis of aphasia [30][31][32][33][36][37][38].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…A study of design and validation of a health questionnaire was proposed. The protocol used was based on the proposals put forward by Carvajal et al [22] and Ramada-Rodilla et al [23] for validating health measurement instruments already used in other studies on the design and validation of assessment instruments based on the NANDA-I and NOC classifications [24,25]. Once the design, construction, and content validity phases of the CEECCA were completed [21], the instrument was tested on a sample of individuals with aphasia to calculate the remaining psychometric properties.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Psychometric Testing of the CEECCA Questionnaire to Assess Ability to Communicate among Individuals with Aphasia

Martín-Dorta

Hernández

Hernández³

et al. 2023

IJERPH

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

(1) Background: The CEECCA questionnaire assesses the ability to communicate among individuals with aphasia. It was designed using the NANDA-I and NOC standardised nursing languages (SNLs), reaching high content validity index and representativeness index values. The questionnaire was pilot-tested, demonstrating its feasibility for use by nurses in any healthcare setting. This study aims to identify the psychometric properties of this instrument. (2) Methods: 47 individuals with aphasia were recruited from primary and specialist care facilities. The instrument was tested for construct validity and criterion validity, reliability, internal consistency, and responsiveness. The NANDA-I and NOC SNLs and the Boston test were used for criterion validity testing. (3) Results: five language dimensions explained 78.6% of the total variance. Convergent criterion validity tests showed concordances of up to 94% (Cohen’s κ: 0.9; p < 0.001) using the Boston test, concordances of up to 81% using DCs of NANDA-I diagnoses (Cohen’s κ: 0.6; p < 0.001), and concordances of up to 96% (Cohen’s κ: 0.9; p < 0.001) using NOC indicators. The internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha) was 0.98. Reliability tests revealed test–retest concordances of 76–100% (p < 0.001). (4) Conclusions: the CEECCA is an easy-to-use, valid, and reliable instrument to assess the ability to communicate among individuals with aphasia.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 93%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Psychometric Testing of the CEECCA Questionnaire to Assess Ability to Communicate among Individuals with Aphasia

Martín-Dorta

Hernández

Hernández³

et al. 2023

IJERPH

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The NOC has numerous applications in the field of care research (Swanson, 2020). A number of outcome criteria, belonging to the classes mentioned above, have provided the basis for the construction of tools for measuring knowledge in health care (Romero et al, 2021;Paloma-Castro et al, 2017).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Use of the Nursing Outcomes Classification (NOC) to measure perceived knowledge about the control of SARS‐CoV‐2 infection: The impact of a training program in primary healthcare professionals

Brito

Fernández-Gutiérrez

Martínez-Alberto

et al. 2021

Int J of Nursing Knowl

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose: To analyze the impact of an online training intervention on primary healthcare professionals in Tenerife (Canary Islands, Spain), evaluating the perceived knowledge about prevention and control of SARS-CoV-2 infection using the NOC outcome "Knowledge: Infection management" [1842]. Methods: Quasi-experimental design with prepost analysis of 12 indicators. The participants were the 705 primary healthcare professionals, both healthcare professionals and nonhealthcare professionals, who completed the online training program prepared and implemented by nurses in the teaching and research fields between May and July 2020.The change in the perceived level of knowledge before and after, as well as other associations between this knowledge and the other variables included in the study, were confirmed. Findings:The results of the study describe significant differences in the change between pre-and posttraining for all indicators included in the comparison. Conclusions: This research shows the effectiveness of an online training program, appropriate for the need for social distancing required by the pandemic, in improving the knowledge of primary healthcare professionals about prevention and control of COVID-19. It also describes a new context for the use of the Nursing Outcomes Classification (NOC) through a training program organized and led by nurses.Implications for nursing practice: Our results suggest that the NOC classification is useful for assessing perceived knowledge about prevention and control of SARS-CoV-2 infection in the community among primary healthcare professionals. This study also provides evidence of the effectiveness of a nurse-led, nurse-designed online training intervention.To this end, the outcome criterion "Knowledge: Infection management" [1842] was used

show abstract

“…Among the lines of research carried out on the basis of this trend, the development and validation of instruments is found with the use of NOC outcome indicators. In fact, among the scales that exist based on NOC, the highlighted are INICIARE [20] INTEGRARE [21], Knowledge: Pain Management [22], CoNOCidiet [23,24] with wide use and scienti c evidence.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Validating the CUIDARE Scale in Measuring the Impact on Patients and the Adaptation Process of their Family Caregivers.

Pórcel‐Gálvez¹,

Fernández‐García²,

García³

et al. 2020

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: The family caregiving process requires adaptation and be evaluated to ensure a correct approach in supporting patients and their caregivers. The objective of the present study is to design and validate an instrument to determine the family caregivers’ adaptation to the caregiving process in relation to the care dependency of hospitalized patients. This paper presents CUIDARE, a validated scale based on the Nursing Outcomes Classification indicators and the Roy Adaptation Model, that evaluates the adaptation process of caregivers in hospital settings and its impact on hospitalized patients. Methods: A cross-sectional and psychometric validation study was carried out in ten public hospitals in the Andalusian Healthcare System. Data collection was undertaken between May 2016 and February 2017 in medical and surgical units, included 432 family caregivers. Results: The CUIDARE scale was shown to be internally consistent (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.818). The Exploratory Factor Analysis grouped 4 items into a single component with a variance-explanatory power of 65.6%. The Confirmatory Factor Analysis tested the unidimensionality of the scale with good fit model (CMIN/DF = 2.152; AGFI = 0.975; NFI = 0.993; CFI = 0.996; RFI = 0.979; RMSEA = 0.052). Conclusions: There is an association between the patients’ care dependency level and the family caregiver’s adaptation to caregiving (p-value <.001). Nursing professionals are encouraged to apply this instrument for the purpose of screening to facilitate the adaptation process of family caregivers and to improve the quality of care.

show abstract

A New Instrument for Measuring Dietary Knowledge in Patients With Diabetes: Psychometric Testing of the CoNOCidiet‐Diabetes

Cited by 5 publications

References 23 publications

Psychometric Testing of the CEECCA Questionnaire to Assess Ability to Communicate among Individuals with Aphasia

Psychometric Testing of the CEECCA Questionnaire to Assess Ability to Communicate among Individuals with Aphasia

Use of the Nursing Outcomes Classification (NOC) to measure perceived knowledge about the control of SARS‐CoV‐2 infection: The impact of a training program in primary healthcare professionals

Validating the CUIDARE Scale in Measuring the Impact on Patients and the Adaptation Process of their Family Caregivers.

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About