2004
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.487344
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A New Indicator of Technological Capabilities for Developed and Developing Countries (ArCo)

Abstract: Zampaglione and two anonymous referees for detailed comments to previous versions. We also wish to thank a large number of national statistical experts who provided information, statistics, and comments to complete and/or corroborate the ArCo database.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
92
0
7

Year Published

2005
2005
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(99 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
92
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Secondly, interesting deviations are found between countries with similar levels of scientific and technological development (as measured by the ArCo index, ARCHIBUGI & COCO, 2004;. 12 Overall, a significant positive correlation is found between the ArCo-index of the African countries and their total publication output (Pearson correlation coefficient r=0.51).…”
Section: Research Performance Of African Countriesmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Secondly, interesting deviations are found between countries with similar levels of scientific and technological development (as measured by the ArCo index, ARCHIBUGI & COCO, 2004;. 12 Overall, a significant positive correlation is found between the ArCo-index of the African countries and their total publication output (Pearson correlation coefficient r=0.51).…”
Section: Research Performance Of African Countriesmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Most of the existing literature has used exclusively macro data to gauge differences in innovation performance across countries (Furman, at al., 2002;Archibugi, Coco, 2004;Fagerberg, Srholec, 2006;Fagerberg, et al, 2007). Some studies using micro data has been recently performed for more than one country (Janz, et al, 2004;Mohnen and Röller, 2005;Mohnen, et al, 2006;Griffith, et al, 2006;Almeida and Fernandes, 2006), but the contextual factors have been at best represented only by a set of relevant country dummies without a serious attempt to actually explain the cross-country differences.…”
Section: A Need For Multilevel Modeling Of Innovationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As measures of the national research infrastructure, we use a set of indicators that has been readily employed for this purpose in the literature (Furman, et al, 2002;Archibugi and Coco, 2004;Fagerberg, et al 2007 In addition, we consider two indicators equivalent to those that are used to capture technological capabilities at the firm level, which are expected to generate "network" externalities is the economy. ISO for which data has been derived directly from this international organization refers to the number of ISO 9000 certifications per capita, and is supposed to reflect quality of the local supply base (and also of the local business customers for that matter).…”
Section: Macro Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, patents can be regarded as realizations of technologies, and patent statistics would therefore be sufficient for TLEs [17,18]. Moreover, several new measures of national technological capability using patent statistics have been developed recently, such as 'ArCo' [19] and the 'Patent Asset Index' [20].…”
Section: The Demands For Data-based Tlesmentioning
confidence: 99%