2006
DOI: 10.4326/jjcvs.35.5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A New Index of Intraoperative Transit-Time Flow Evaluation in Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

Abstract: It is essential to evaluate the quality of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) anastomosis in the operating room. Transit-time flow measurement has been increasingly used for this purpose, because it is less invasive, more reproducible, and less time consuming. The electrocardiogram-gated flow measurement has made it possible to identify the systolic flow (Qs)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some reports suggest that to be satisfactory, grafts need to meet the following values: PI less than 5.0, DFI greater than 50, and MGF greater than 10 or 15 mL/min. 5,6 By those criteria, among our 159 patients, 12 RITAs (8%), 13 LITAs (8%), 20 GEAs (23%), and 10 SVGs (20%) failed to achieve satisfactory PI scores (with PI being immeasurably high in some cases). Among these poor-scoring grafts, additional substandard DFI scores were found in two LITAs and six GEAs, and among the grafts with substandard PI and DFI scores, one LITA and one GEA also had substandard MGF scores (G10 mL/min).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Some reports suggest that to be satisfactory, grafts need to meet the following values: PI less than 5.0, DFI greater than 50, and MGF greater than 10 or 15 mL/min. 5,6 By those criteria, among our 159 patients, 12 RITAs (8%), 13 LITAs (8%), 20 GEAs (23%), and 10 SVGs (20%) failed to achieve satisfactory PI scores (with PI being immeasurably high in some cases). Among these poor-scoring grafts, additional substandard DFI scores were found in two LITAs and six GEAs, and among the grafts with substandard PI and DFI scores, one LITA and one GEA also had substandard MGF scores (G10 mL/min).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…10) Figure 2 shows that even at a mean flow rate of ≤20 ml/min, the postoperative graft had not always failed, thus suggesting that graft performance cannot be assessed based solely on flow rate. Furthermore, statistical correlations were identified between flow rate and resistance, and between resistance and compliance ( Figs.…”
Section: Commentmentioning
confidence: 99%