The human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) type 1 nef gene product was expressed as an N-terminal fusion protein with glutathione-S-transferase (GST) in the baculovirus system. The resulting nefGST fusion protein was found to be authentically myristylated at the N terminus and could be purified to homogeneity by one-step affinity chromatography on immobilized glutathione. The high affinity of nefGST for glutathione was exploited to develop an assay to identify cellular proteins capable of interacting with nef Several such proteins were identified in extracts from the Jurkat human T cell line. The interaction between neJZbinding proteins and immobilized nefGST could be specifically competed by the addition of soluble nef Cell fractionation showed that neJ:binding proteins were present in both cytosolic and membrane-associated fractions. A non-myristylated derivative failed to bind to the membrane-associated proteins but was able to bind to the cytosolic group, albeit with reduced affinity. In addition, a single protein present in both soluble and membrane-associated fractions exhibited myristylation-independent binding to nef By analogy with other myristylated proteins such as MARCKS (myristylated alanine-rich C kinase substrate) and the Rous sarcoma virus transforming protein, src, the membrane-associated proteins that bind only to myristylated nef may represent a specific membrane target for nef The cytosolic proteins that interact with nef may constitute soluble components of an as yet unidentified signal transduction pathway which is the target of nefaction in the HIV-l-infected cell.
IntroductionThe nef gene of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) type 1 encodes a polypeptide of between 200 and 205 amino acids, varying between isolates (Harris et al., 1992a). Despite intensive work, the precise function of the nefgene product remains the subject of controversy. Initial studies identified the protein as a repressor of viral replication (Fisher et al., 1986; Luciw et al., 1987;Terwilliger et al., 1986) that acted by down-regulation of transcription from the HIV-1 long terminal repeat (LTR) (Ahmad & Venkatesan, 1988; Niederman et al., 1989;Maitra et al., 1991), but other studies failed to reproduce these results (Kim et al., 1989;Hammes et al., 1989; Bachelerie et al., 1990). There is a significant degree of amino acid sequence variation between nefisolates both in vivo and in vitro (Harris et al., 1992a) and the contradictions regarding nef function may represent the consequences of this variation. This problem was highlighted by a number of recent studies. Terwilliger et al. (1991) demonstrated that the replication of the IIIB provirus was suppressed by the corresponding IIIB nef allele but that replacement of nefin the IIIB provirus by the ELI nefallele enhanced the growth of the provirus. A number of amino acid residues in the ELI nef gene were subsequently identified as important for this enhancement, including Cys143, Cysl70 and Leu182 (Zazapoulos & Haseltine, 1992). Luria et al. (1991) examined the effect...