2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.talanta.2020.121638
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new highly enriched 233U reference material for improved simultaneous determination of uranium amount and isotope amount ratios in trace level samples

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The sources of imprecision and error, throughout the measurement process, are of fundamental concern. In general, poor quantitative accuracy can be remedied using a bracketed analysis of isotopic standards to correct for what is colloquially termed “mass bias” in the case of sector-field spectrometry. , Despite this, it is pertinent to look at the effects that these parameters have on the “raw” IR accuracy. The effects of transient lengths on the accuracy of the IRs, using peak heights and peak areas are shown in upper portion of Figure using a nominal value of 8140 transient coadditions; a number yielding high-fidelity signals for the very minor isotopes as presented in Figure .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sources of imprecision and error, throughout the measurement process, are of fundamental concern. In general, poor quantitative accuracy can be remedied using a bracketed analysis of isotopic standards to correct for what is colloquially termed “mass bias” in the case of sector-field spectrometry. , Despite this, it is pertinent to look at the effects that these parameters have on the “raw” IR accuracy. The effects of transient lengths on the accuracy of the IRs, using peak heights and peak areas are shown in upper portion of Figure using a nominal value of 8140 transient coadditions; a number yielding high-fidelity signals for the very minor isotopes as presented in Figure .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…High levels of precision rely on the repeatability of the sample introduction process, and the stability of the ionization source and that of the MS measurement system. Accuracy, is generally a less stringent aspect regarding the instrumentation as the use of various correction factors based on use of standard samples, can remedy nonuniform instrument responses (Mathew et al, 2013; Essex et al, 2021). Of course, this only works if the measurements themselves have a high level of precision.…”
Section: Analytical Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%