The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2016
DOI: 10.1080/00949655.2016.1198906
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimator and inference under heteroskedasticity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…• We shall consider alternative covariance matrix estimators that are consistent under both homoskedasticity and heteroskedasticity, such as HC5 (Cribari-Neto, Souza, and Vasconcellos 2007) and HC5m (Li et al 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• We shall consider alternative covariance matrix estimators that are consistent under both homoskedasticity and heteroskedasticity, such as HC5 (Cribari-Neto, Souza, and Vasconcellos 2007) and HC5m (Li et al 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first HC-estimator was HC0 proposed by White (1980), called a Sandwich estimator. Next were: HC1 by Hinkley (1977), HC2 by MacKinnon and White (1985), HC3 by Efron (1982), HC4 by Cribari-Neto (2004), HC5 by Cribari-Neto, Souza and Vasconcellos (2007), HC4m by Cribari-Neto and da Silva (2011) and there are still being created new ones, like the newest HC5m by Li et al (2017), each improving previous ones. Formulas of all eight are given below.…”
Section: Heteroskedasticity-consistent Covariance Matrix Estimatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most recently presented HC5m-estimator by Li (et al, 2017), combines strengths of HC4m for low degree of leverages and HC5 for high degree of leverages. Simulations performed by Li (et al, 2017) showed that HC5m-based tests are reliable at points both with low or with high leverages and they have the smallest size distortions among tests based on all of HC3, HC4, HC4m and HC5.…”
Section: Heteroskedasticity-consistent Covariance Matrix Estimatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%