2007
DOI: 10.1159/000100408
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new heritable fragile site at 15q13 in a three-generation family

Abstract: Here, we describe a family ascertained through recurrent spontaneous abortions in which a new heritable fragile site located at 15q13 is segregating. The fragile site was present in nine members of a three-generation family and expressed spontaneously in a high proportion of the metaphases varying from 88 to 95% under standard culture conditions in all the carriers. This didn’t change under folate deficiency.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our analysis establishes that in three cases out of four (BP2-BP3, BP3-BP5, and BP4-BP5), the inverted orientation is the ancestral state; these include the BP2-BP3 and BP4-BP5 regions, which are the only ones inverted in the human population and they are also hotspots of recurrent CNV associated with disease. While our study primarily focuses on the evolutionary analysis of structural variations in the 15q11-q13 region, it is worth noting that this region has indeed been recognized as a breakage-prone area, harboring fragile sites within the human genome [61][62][63]. Fragile sites are regions in the genome that are prone to breakage and instability, often resulting in structural variations and genomic rearrangements [64].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our analysis establishes that in three cases out of four (BP2-BP3, BP3-BP5, and BP4-BP5), the inverted orientation is the ancestral state; these include the BP2-BP3 and BP4-BP5 regions, which are the only ones inverted in the human population and they are also hotspots of recurrent CNV associated with disease. While our study primarily focuses on the evolutionary analysis of structural variations in the 15q11-q13 region, it is worth noting that this region has indeed been recognized as a breakage-prone area, harboring fragile sites within the human genome [61][62][63]. Fragile sites are regions in the genome that are prone to breakage and instability, often resulting in structural variations and genomic rearrangements [64].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Spontaneous fragile sites occur without the need for induction at chromosomal locations distinct from either the common or rare fragile sites. These spontaneous sites can be expressed at unusually high levels, from 80 to 100% of the population, compared to the 4–30% for most fragile sites ( Dar et al, 1995 ; Karadeniz et al, 2003 ; Zamani et al, 2007 ). The nature of the molecular cause (sequence, epigenetic, or other) of most of these spontaneous fragile sites is not known and warrants further investigation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The length of the chromosomal gaps or despiralized regions can vary widely between individuals, is considered to be hereditary, and due to the highly variable lengths of the satellite tracts ( Craig-Holmes and Shaw, 1971 ; Yunis and Yasmineh, 1971 ; Craig-Holmes et al, 1975 , 1973 ; McKenzie and Lubs, 1973 ; Podugolnikova and Korostelev, 1980 ). These spontaneous, heritable fragile sites often map to loci known to be prone to structural variations including microdeletions, microduplications, and copy number variations (CNVs) ( Zamani et al, 2007 ; Szafranski et al, 2010 ; Gillentine and Schaaf, 2015 ). Viral integration can also be a driving factor for these spontaneous sites ( O’Neill and Miles, 1969 ; Peat and Stanley, 1986 ) (reviewed in ( Fortunato and Spector, 2003 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%