1992
DOI: 10.1016/0300-9467(92)80002-r
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new group contribution method for predicting viscosity of organic liquids

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
45
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
3
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…volatile (Goldstein and Galbally, 2007), more dense (Kuwata et al, 2012), more viscous (Sastri and Rao, 1992), and more CCN active (Suda et al, 2014).…”
Section: D Petters Et Al: Prediction Of Cloud Condensation Nuclementioning
confidence: 99%
“…volatile (Goldstein and Galbally, 2007), more dense (Kuwata et al, 2012), more viscous (Sastri and Rao, 1992), and more CCN active (Suda et al, 2014).…”
Section: D Petters Et Al: Prediction Of Cloud Condensation Nuclementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Quasi-equilibrium versus kinetically limited or non-equilibrium SOA growth remains an open issue and warrants further investigations. Group contribution methods have been used to predict the viscosities of pure compounds when the functionality and molecular structure are known (Sastri and Rao, 1992;Rothfuss and Petters, 2017a). Song et al (2016b) showed that estimations from group contribution approaches combined with either non-ideal or ideal mixing reproduced the RH-dependent trends particularly well for the alcohol, dicarboxylic, and tricarboxylic acid systems with viscosities of up to 10 4 Pa s. In contrast, model calculations overestimated the viscosity of more viscous compounds including monosaccharides, disaccharides, and trisaccharides by many orders of magnitude (Song et al, 2016b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The constraints g(z,y)0 are defined according to the description of the case study μ(T)1000 0.97xCH4(3)0 where μ is the solvent's viscosity (in cP) and xCH4(3) is the mole fraction of methane in Stream (3). The viscosity is estimated by the method of Sastri and Rao . Further, there is a constraint on the normal melting point Tmelt of the solvent (in K) for which two cases are considered: Case 1: TmeltT+100 Case 2: TmeltT+300 …”
Section: Hierarchical Solvent and Process Design For Co2 Absorptionmentioning
confidence: 99%