2022
DOI: 10.1007/s10914-021-09599-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A New Glyptodont (Xenarthra: Cingulata) from the Late Miocene of Argentina: New Clues About the Oldest Extra-Patagonian Radiation in Southern South America

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
7
0
1

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
2
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…5C) also show a "rosette" ornamentation pattern. This pattern is identified in all specimens and is similar to that described by Barasoain et al (2022) for glyptodonts from CAF levels cropping out in the Chasicó creek (e.g., PV-UNS-260). These authors suggested the existence of a single morphotype for the Chasicoan assemblages from central Argentina, which corresponds to Kelenkura castroi, recently described and not linkable with any of the known Glyptodontidae tribes (Barasoain et al, 2022).…”
Section: Taxonomic and Biostratigraphic Analysessupporting
confidence: 83%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…5C) also show a "rosette" ornamentation pattern. This pattern is identified in all specimens and is similar to that described by Barasoain et al (2022) for glyptodonts from CAF levels cropping out in the Chasicó creek (e.g., PV-UNS-260). These authors suggested the existence of a single morphotype for the Chasicoan assemblages from central Argentina, which corresponds to Kelenkura castroi, recently described and not linkable with any of the known Glyptodontidae tribes (Barasoain et al, 2022).…”
Section: Taxonomic and Biostratigraphic Analysessupporting
confidence: 83%
“…This pattern is identified in all specimens and is similar to that described by Barasoain et al (2022) for glyptodonts from CAF levels cropping out in the Chasicó creek (e.g., PV-UNS-260). These authors suggested the existence of a single morphotype for the Chasicoan assemblages from central Argentina, which corresponds to Kelenkura castroi, recently described and not linkable with any of the known Glyptodontidae tribes (Barasoain et al, 2022). The slight variations in the ornamentation of osteoderms probably led to the identification of several taxa in previous works, but it would be the result of taphonomic processes (e.g., abrasion, weathering, soil corrosion), that modified their external surface.…”
Section: Taxonomic and Biostratigraphic Analysessupporting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Most of the taxonomic and phylogenetic arrangements proposed for fossil cingulates are mainly based on morphological features of the exposed surface of dorsal carapace osteoderms, such as shape, ornamentation pattern, and number, size, and location of foramina. However, the almost exclusive use of osteoderms as diagnostic elements to differentiate species (in several cases, isolated osteoderms without data on their provenance or certainty about their location in the dorsal carapace, among other factors) has led to several species being named that were later recognized to be invalid and an overestimation of the diversity of the clade (Zurita et al 2016(Zurita et al , 2017Barasoain et al 2022). Recently, taphonomic analyses have begun to be applied as a complementary tool to understand how osteoderms have been modified by taphonomic processes and, on this basis, to solve taxonomic issues involving Cenozoic representatives of this group.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, taphonomic analyses have begun to be applied as a complementary tool to understand how osteoderms have been modified by taphonomic processes and, on this basis, to solve taxonomic issues involving Cenozoic representatives of this group. These studies have proposed that some taxa of glyptodonts (Urotherium antiquum, U. simplex, Paraglyptodon chapadmalensis, Trachycalyptus chapadmalensis, Lomaphorus chapalmalensis) were identified and characterized based on osteoderms affected by different processes (i.e., weathering, abrasion, soil corrosion) that modified the original ornamentation patterns and, therefore, resulted in taxonomic misidentifications (Zurita et al 2016(Zurita et al , 2017Barasoain et al 2022;Tomassini et al 2023).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%