2006
DOI: 10.1651/c-2509.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A New Giant Species of Predatory Fairy Shrimp from Idaho, USA (Branchiopoda: Anostraca)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
15
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
2
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The incisor process of C. macroura also bears similarity to that of B. raptor and the rapacious decapod Procaris ascensionis Chace and Manning, 1972, in being relatively pronounced, sharp, and blade-like (Chace and Manning, 1972;Rogers et al, 2006). The morphology and remarkable size of the mandible of C. macroura suggests that it may have been a predatory species.…”
Section: 2)mentioning
confidence: 87%
“…The incisor process of C. macroura also bears similarity to that of B. raptor and the rapacious decapod Procaris ascensionis Chace and Manning, 1972, in being relatively pronounced, sharp, and blade-like (Chace and Manning, 1972;Rogers et al, 2006). The morphology and remarkable size of the mandible of C. macroura suggests that it may have been a predatory species.…”
Section: 2)mentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Anostraca consume a wide variety of organic particles, such as phytoplankton and bacteria (Brendonck 1993a,b, Dierckens et al 1997 and are also known to ingest rotifers (Starkweather 2005), nematodes, cladocerans (Bernice 1971) and other small invertebrates (Mertens et al 1990). Some large anostracans even actively hunt and predate on other organisms (Fryer 1966, White et al 1969, Rogers et al 2006. The omnivory of Anostraca allows them to utilize a wide range of food types, providing the necessary fl exibility to survive in these nutrient poor habitats.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These two species co-occur, and are potential competitors; however B. hiberna rapidly grows to maturity in about a third less time than B. disimilis. Branchinecta hiberna was also reported as cöoccurring with B. lindahli and B. coloradensis Packard, 1874 in Idaho (in separate habitats), with the same rapid development and maturing faster than the other two species (Rogers et al, 2006). Two of the B. mackini Dexter, 1956 populations listed in Tab.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…However, when subjected to conditions from its origin, hatching did occur, but at a lower fraction than for the same cultures that were only given origin conditions. This suggests that the Riverside County conditions either caused some mortality or provided hatching inhibition cues (Belk, 1973;Belk and Nelson, 1995 Different lineages sharing a single habitat have been observed in the genus Branchinecta; however these lineages were different species (Eriksen and Belk, 1999;Rogers and Fugate, 2001;Rogers et al, 2006). Tab.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%