1963
DOI: 10.4039/ent951185-11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A New Genus of Rhagionidae (Diptera) with Notes and Descriptions of Bolbomyia Loew

Abstract: Litoleptis alaskensis, a new genus and species from Alaska, and Bolbomyia melanderi, a new species from the Appalachians, are described. Cekendia wuorentausi is redescribed, and the genus synonymyzed with Bolbomyia. Further records of the Nearctic species of Bolbomyia are given. A generic group composed of Hilarimorpha, Litoleptis, Bolbomyia, Archicera and Austroleptis is proposed.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1975
1975
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
(1 reference statement)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The differences are as follows: R2 + 3 ending on C close to apex of R1 in Cretahilarimorpha gen. nov.; part of R4 + 5 basal of r-m longer than basal stem of Rs in Cretahilarimorpha while it is distinctly shorter in the modern Hilarimorpha; part of M between r-m and bm-cu very long and angular; CuA2 and A1 not touching; and cell cup very long, ending distal to apex of cell bm. The rhagionid genus Litoleptis Chilcott, 1963 has a wing venation similar to those of Cretahilarimorpha and Hilarimorpha, especially in the absence of the discal cell (Chilcott, 1963). The main difference in venation is the R5 and R4 + 5 subequal in length in Litoleptis while R5 is distinctly shorter in Cretahilarimorpha and Hilarimorpha (Kerr, 2010), even if Cretahilarimorpha shares with Litoleptis an apically open cell cup.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The differences are as follows: R2 + 3 ending on C close to apex of R1 in Cretahilarimorpha gen. nov.; part of R4 + 5 basal of r-m longer than basal stem of Rs in Cretahilarimorpha while it is distinctly shorter in the modern Hilarimorpha; part of M between r-m and bm-cu very long and angular; CuA2 and A1 not touching; and cell cup very long, ending distal to apex of cell bm. The rhagionid genus Litoleptis Chilcott, 1963 has a wing venation similar to those of Cretahilarimorpha and Hilarimorpha, especially in the absence of the discal cell (Chilcott, 1963). The main difference in venation is the R5 and R4 + 5 subequal in length in Litoleptis while R5 is distinctly shorter in Cretahilarimorpha and Hilarimorpha (Kerr, 2010), even if Cretahilarimorpha shares with Litoleptis an apically open cell cup.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…He also stated that "the stalk Family RHAGIONIDAE Latreille, 1802 Genus LITOLEPTIS Chillcott, 1963 Type species. Litoleptis alaskensis Chillcott, 1963 Litoleptis araeostylus Greenwalt, sp. nov.…”
Section: Remarksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Litoleptis orientalis is larger than L. araeostylus (2.7 mm wing length vs. 1.7 mm), and the fork of R 4+5 is distal to the fork of M 1+2 . Litoleptis alaskensis Chillcott, 1963, also has the fork of R 4+5 significantly distal to the fork of M 1+2 ; it also lacks the needle-like seta at the terminus of the flagellum (Chillcott, 1963).…”
Section: Remarksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Below is a list of characters used in reconstructing spaniine relationships. The original sources of most characters are cited accordingly, including Chillcott (1963), Hennig (1972), Kerr (2010), and Kato (2016a, 2016b), along with the character number used in that study (e.g., Kerr, 2010: 109) and a number in brackets after that signifies the char¬ acter state. 5.…”
Section: Relationshipsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Litoleptis, including fossilis: 24. Tibial spurs lost (Chillcott, 1963), though hind tibial spur apparently present and min¬ ute in L. fossilis (Arillo et al 2009). This needs to be carefully checked in the fossil since hind tibial spurs do not occur in any living Litoleptis nor in the closely related genera Spania and Spaniopsis, and small spurs (i.e., articulating in the intersegmental membrane) are sometimes difficult to discern even in modern specimens.…”
Section: Relationshipsmentioning
confidence: 99%