“…Because of the lack of consensus of previous authors about the validity or recognition of some genera of Ectrichodiini ( Dougherty 1995 ; Carpintero and Maldonado 1996 ), there is a need of a taxonomic revision and a phylogenetic analysis of all these genera ( Gil-Santana et al 2015 , 2020 ). For instance, Pseudoracelda Carpintero, 1980 was considered to be a junior synonym of Racelda Signoret, 1863 by Dougherty (1995) but a valid genus by Carpintero and Maldonado (1996) , Forero (2004) , Gil-Santana et al (2013 , 2015 , 2020 ), and Forthman and Gil-Santana (2021) . It is noteworthy that in this case, Dougherty (1995 : 175) justified her synonymization of these genera by stating that Pseudoracelda would have been erected by Carpintero (1980) for a female “whose character description fits well within the diversity seen in the sexual dimorphism of the genus Racelda .” She also stated that P. macrocephala Carpintero, 1980 “is retained as a species of Racelda because the unique specimen is unavailable for study.” In Ectrichodiinae , the sexual dimorphism ranges from slight (e.g., body size, development of the hemelytron, and eye and ocellar size) to extreme, where females exhibit brachyptery to aptery in both pairs of wings and major modifications in other parts of the body ( Forthman and Weirauch 2017 ).…”