A new future for the past: a model for adaptive reuse decision‐making

Abstract

Purpose -Adaptive reuse is an effective strategy for optimizing the operational and commercial performance of built assets. While the benefits of adaptive re-use have been widely espoused, it would appear that owners and practitioners lack a point of reference to justify and evaluate their decisionmaking with regard to reusing existing assets. This paper therefore aims to develop a model to assist practitioners with their decision-making when considering to re-use or demolish an existing built asset. Design/methodology/approach -To gain an understanding of the issues that owners and practitioners are confronted with when considering adaptive re-use, demolition and issues pertaining to sustainability, an interpretative research approach was adopted. A total of 81 in-depth interviews were conducted over a six-month period with a variety of stakeholders such as architects, developers, planners, building managers/owners and property consultants. Content analysis was used as the primary analysis technique on the collected data.Findings -The analysis of the interviews revealed three key criteria are used to examine adaptive reuse decision making: capital investment; asset condition; and regulation. While financial criteria such as development and construction costs were the primary determinants influencing the decision reuse or demolish, the physical condition of the asset juxtaposed with regulations were also considered. Additionally, issues associated with the environmental, economic and social tenets of sustainability were identified as being important but had been given less priority when considering reuse. As current building stock is rapidly becoming obsolete, increasing emphasis is beginning to be placed on them during the adaptive reuse decision-making process to ensure sustainable outcomes. Practical implications -The developed model identifies the critical areas that owners, developers and key project stakeholders need to consider when deciding to either reuse or demolish an existing building. It also can be used to evaluate the economic, physical and social implications of undertaking a heritage project. Project and asset managers need to be aware of the impact that different variables have on a reuse project's construction and operational performance as well as long term commercial performance. Originality/value -The proposed adaptive reuse decision-making model is grounded in practice and therefore encompasses the real-life dilemmas and issues facing practitioners. The model captures the complexity associated with the adaptive reuse process and provides an important reference point for developing future ex-ante evaluation models for its investment justification.

The Preliminary Assessment of Adaptation Potential in Existing Office Buildings

“…With this approach property attributes which do not account for variance in adaptation are not taken into account because the PCA retains only the important attributes. The consideration of unimportant attributes is an issue with existing decision making tools which either considered all attributes equally or ascribed weightings based on Downloaded by [Gazi University] at 05:07 04 February 2015 expert opinion and or a limited number of cases (Bullen, Love 2011;Remøy, van der Voordt 2007;Arge 2005;Chudley 1981;Langston, Shen 2007;Kincaid 2002;Arup 2008). In this respect the model represents an original approach and contribution to knowledge and an important step forward in the decision-making process where adaptation is being considered as an option.…”

Repurposing the Built Environment: Emerging Challenges and Key Entry Points for Future Research

“…Focusing on the cultural changes in the debate, this paper aims to bridge the gap between international charters and ongoing research for built environments losing their original uses, addressing a theoretical problem that can affect future design in several practical ways [28]. The method is based on a content analysis.…”

“…Due to cost containment, the achievement of performance levels equal to those of a new construction cannot be reached [23]. An adaptive reuse strategy is preferable only to demolition if it is possible to achieve the objectives of environmental sustainability and reduction of energy consumption [28].…”

The Criteria For Decision Making In Adaptive Reuse Towards Sustainable Development

“…This is because, adaptive reuse can extend the life of buildings and avoid demolition wastes, promote reuse of contained energy and also provide environmental, social and economic benefits to the community (Yung and Chan, 2012). While the benefit of adaptive reuse widely espoused, however, it would appear that owners and practitioners still lack a point of reference to justify and evaluate their decision making with regard to the adaptation of adaptive reuse of existing buildings (Bullen and Love, 2011b). Douglas (2006) ague that decision making is complex in the adaptive reuse building because there are many parties involved in the adaptation and each party presents a different perspective.…”