2022
DOI: 10.1007/s10064-022-02597-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new formula for predicting probabilistic seismic displacement of reinforced slope with one row of piles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Jia 1 proposed a dynamic calculation method for rock slope stability considering anchor rods, and established the seismic degradation effect of rock anchor slopes. Nazari 2 adopted a numerical sliding model to calculate the displacement of pile-reinforced slopes based on the results of numerical simulation and statistical analysis. Huang 3 presented the results of a series of 50 g dynamic centrifuge tests that replicated the seismic response of pile-anchor reinforced slopes exposed to seismic stress fields.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Jia 1 proposed a dynamic calculation method for rock slope stability considering anchor rods, and established the seismic degradation effect of rock anchor slopes. Nazari 2 adopted a numerical sliding model to calculate the displacement of pile-reinforced slopes based on the results of numerical simulation and statistical analysis. Huang 3 presented the results of a series of 50 g dynamic centrifuge tests that replicated the seismic response of pile-anchor reinforced slopes exposed to seismic stress fields.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies have predominantly adopted Newmark analysis or the limit equilibrium method, taking the permanent slope displacement or stability coefficient as the only index to evaluate the stability of reinforced slopes 12,13 . Although the aforementioned studies have provided the corresponding design parameters, they have ignored considering the safety of the pile-anchor system itself and failed to fully consider the complexity of seismic loading.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%