A new formula for estimating endotracheal tube insertion depth in neonates

Chen, Chung-Ming

doi:10.1016/j.pedneo.2018.04.007

Cited by 5 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 6 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…A seminal study reported that the tracheal midpoint corresponds internally to a line drawn between the medial heads of the clavicles and hence clavicles have also been employed as a reference point [15]. When placed correctly, the tip of the ETT must be positioned in the mid-tracheal region, halfway between the inferior clavicle and carina, which also coincides with our clinical rule [16]. However, Blayney et al found the inconsistent position of the clavicle on chest X-ray and suggested using the first thoracic vertebra as a marker for correct tip placement [17].…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 80%

Determining Carina and Clavicular Distance-Dependent Positioning of Endotracheal Tube in Critically Ill Patients: An Artificial Intelligence-Based Approach

Tsai

Yuan

Hou

et al. 2022

Biology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Early and accurate prediction of endotracheal tube (ETT) location is pivotal for critically ill patients. Automatic and timely detection of faulty ETT locations from chest X-ray images may avert patients’ morbidity and mortality. Therefore, we designed convolutional neural network (CNN)-based algorithms to evaluate ETT position appropriateness relative to four detected key points, including tracheal tube end, carina, and left/right clavicular heads on chest radiographs. We estimated distances from the tube end to tracheal carina and the midpoint of clavicular heads. A DenseNet121 encoder transformed images into embedding features, and a CNN-based decoder generated the probability distributions. Based on four sets of tube-to-carina distance-dependent parameters (i.e., (i) 30–70 mm, (ii) 30–60 mm, (iii) 20–60 mm, and (iv) 20–55 mm), corresponding models were generated, and their accuracy was evaluated through the predicted L1 distance to ground-truth coordinates. Based on tube-to-carina and tube-to-clavicle distances, the highest sensitivity, and specificity of 92.85% and 84.62% respectively, were revealed for 20–55 mm. This implies that tube-to-carina distance between 20 and 55 mm is optimal for an AI-based key point appropriateness detection system and is empirically comparable to physicians’ consensus.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 80%