1990
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-246x.1990.tb01761.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new fold test for palaeomagnetic studies

Abstract: S U M M A R Y Previous techniques for judging the significance of a palaeomagnetic fold test are either invalid or insufficiently flexible. It is shown that under appropriate circumstances an isolated-observation test may be added to the range of statistical tests used to judge a fold test. A powerful new test is developed based on a test statistic that is sensitive to correlation between the distribution of site-mean directions about the overall mean direction and the tectonic corrections. This test is suffic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
455
0
2

Year Published

1995
1995
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 577 publications
(478 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
7
455
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In such cases (localities 10 and 13, see Table 2) the mean paleomagnetic directions for a given locality were determined in three different ways. One was based on linear segments, the second was calculated from the last meaningful demagnetization steps, and the third was based on the combination of stable vectors and remagnetization circles (McFadden 1990). As Table 2 documents, the three methods provided the same directions (within the error limit).…”
Section: Laboratory Measurements and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In such cases (localities 10 and 13, see Table 2) the mean paleomagnetic directions for a given locality were determined in three different ways. One was based on linear segments, the second was calculated from the last meaningful demagnetization steps, and the third was based on the combination of stable vectors and remagnetization circles (McFadden 1990). As Table 2 documents, the three methods provided the same directions (within the error limit).…”
Section: Laboratory Measurements and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…[19] The fold test could not be effected in the LM section because the basalt flows have a monoclinal structure. However, a fold test was performed while the series at GM are combined and was positive at the 95% confidence level [McFadden, 1990], with x 2(in situ) = 27.25, x 2(tilt corrected) = 5.4, x c = 7.264 (N = 39 sites for the both sections). In the other case, reversal directions obtained from both the LM and GM sections could also be used for performing a fold test, which also passed at the 99% confidence level with x 2(in situ) = 25.27, x 2(tilt corrected) = 6.918, x c = 9.157 (N = 31 sites).…”
Section: Magnetic Results and Polarity Sequencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Site mean directions were computed using the statistics of Fisher (1953). The statistical methods of McE1-hinny (1964) and McFadden (1990) have been used to constrain the age of magnetisation relative to the folding episodes affecting a number of drilled sequences.…”
Section: Palaeomagnetic Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%