2007
DOI: 10.1007/s10953-007-9144-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A New Flow Instrument for Conductance Measurements at Elevated Temperatures and Pressures: Measurements on NaCl(aq) to 458 K and 1.4 MPa

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
20
1
Order By: Relevance
“…At odds with the present results, Zimmerman et al [8] found no differences between Units as in Table 1. In addition, R s ± 95 percent confidence limits, X with leads correction; K exp , K cor , and K lit , SÁcm 2 Ámol -1 ; K cor are K exp are corrected to room pressure using a pressure coefficient calculated from Zimmerman et al [8], K lit have been interpolated from the results reported in Chambers et al [16] and Shedlovsky [17], as taken from Robinson and Stokes [18] at the concentrations of the present results; %dK is the percent difference between K cor and K lit as given by Eq. 27 J Solution Chem methods A and C for a different concentric cylinder high temperature cell.…”
Section: Comparison Of the Extrapolation Methods With Previous Workcontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…At odds with the present results, Zimmerman et al [8] found no differences between Units as in Table 1. In addition, R s ± 95 percent confidence limits, X with leads correction; K exp , K cor , and K lit , SÁcm 2 Ámol -1 ; K cor are K exp are corrected to room pressure using a pressure coefficient calculated from Zimmerman et al [8], K lit have been interpolated from the results reported in Chambers et al [16] and Shedlovsky [17], as taken from Robinson and Stokes [18] at the concentrations of the present results; %dK is the percent difference between K cor and K lit as given by Eq. 27 J Solution Chem methods A and C for a different concentric cylinder high temperature cell.…”
Section: Comparison Of the Extrapolation Methods With Previous Workcontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…They clearly showed that the traditional method of setting the exponent to 0.5 introduced significant error for their new cell and pointed out the work of Ragheb and Geddes [26] that shows that the value of this exponent is dependent upon the type of metal and its surface as well as the solution in the cell. However, since Zimmerman et al [8] found no difference between this method and Methods A and D (see below), this extrapolation was also considered. When applying this method, only frequencies between 1 Simulated impedance spectra using Eq.…”
Section: Methods Cmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The values from the two models agreed with the data to within the experimental uncertainty and agreed with one another to within 1 % or better. Recently, Zimmerman et al 15,16 reported that Λ°could be represented accurately by simple empirical functions of the solvent viscosity and density. It was found that the present sodium chloride results and those available in the literature could be fitted, if the viscosity was greater than 0.00055 Poise, using an empirical equation, which takes the form:…”
Section: Ionic Transport Properties Andmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the first class of solid electrolytes is well studied [5][6][7][8][9][10], the electrical and optical properties of solid electrolytes of the second class are being intensively investigated. Among them are high temperature phases of α-Li 2 SO 4 (586-860 °C), α-Ag 2 SO 4 (412-660 °C) sulfates of one-valent metals (Li + , Na + and Ag + ) and also solids Li 2 SO 4 -Na 2 SO 4 and Li 2 SO 4 -Ag 2 SO 4 , Na 2 SO 4 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%