2017
DOI: 10.1111/2041-210x.12706
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new family of standardized and symmetric indices for measuring the intensity and importance of plant neighbour effects

Abstract: Summary1. Measurements of competition and facilitation between plants often rely upon intensity and importance indices that quantify the net effect of neighbours on the performance of a target plant. A systematic analysis of the mathematical behaviour of the indices is lacking and leads to structural pitfalls, e.g. statistical problems detected in importance indices. 2. We summarize and analyse the mathematical properties that the indices should display. We review the properties of the commonly used indices fo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
52
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…W −n was taken as the mean fitness of plants without neighbours within a growth chamber. RII is symmetric about zero enabling unbiased detection of competition and facilitation, and it is standardized so that the different competitive scenarios in this experiment can be directly compared (Diaz‐Sierra, Verwijmeren, Rietkerk, Dios, & Baudena, ; Weigelt & Jolliffe, ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…W −n was taken as the mean fitness of plants without neighbours within a growth chamber. RII is symmetric about zero enabling unbiased detection of competition and facilitation, and it is standardized so that the different competitive scenarios in this experiment can be directly compared (Diaz‐Sierra, Verwijmeren, Rietkerk, Dios, & Baudena, ; Weigelt & Jolliffe, ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This measure is more suitable for quantifying competition and facilitation intensity than the more widely used relative interaction index (RII), which may underestimate facilitation (Díaz‐Sierra et al. ). The value NInt A was calculated for each subordinate species and pot using the equation normalNIntnormalA=2ΔP/PN+ΔP, where Δ P is the difference between aboveground biomass of the target subordinate species with neighbors ( P + N ) and without neighbors ( P − N ) of C. elata (ΔP=P+NPN). This index tends to a value of −1 for competitive exclusion and to +2 for obligate facilitation.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…S2) are independent of the measure of species asynchrony used. To estimate the competition-facilitation balance (intensity of facilitation vs. competition) between the dominant and subordinate species across hydrological regimes, we used the additive intensity index (NInt A ; D ıaz- Sierra et al 2017). This measure is more suitable for quantifying competition and facilitation intensity than the more widely used relative interaction index (RII), which may underestimate facilitation (D ıaz- Sierra et al 2017).…”
Section: Statistical Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Fisher’s exact test was used to compare the proportion of Crotalaria seedlings growing within or outside tussocks with the respective ratio of area taken up by tussocks and open soil. To quantify the interaction between Crotalaria and Stipagrostis , we calculated the Neighbor‐Effect Intensity Index (NInt A ) introduced by Díaz‐Sierra, Verwijmeren, Rietkerk, de Dios, and Baudena (2017) based on the average tussock area of Stipagrostis for each year. NInt A is defined as 2 *( dB )/( B 0 +| dB |), with B 0   = tussock area of Stipagrostis growing alone and dB  =  B 0 –tussock area of Stipagrostis growing with Crotalaria as competitor.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%