2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.cam.2008.05.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new family of conjugate gradient methods

Abstract: a b s t r a c tIn this paper we develop a new class of conjugate gradient methods for unconstrained optimization problems. A new nonmonotone line search technique is proposed to guarantee the global convergence of these conjugate gradient methods under some mild conditions. In particular, Polak-Ribiére-Polyak and Liu-Storey conjugate gradient methods are special cases of the new class of conjugate gradient methods. By estimating the local Lipschitz constant of the derivative of objective functions, we can find… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the first step, the energy was minimized by the steepest‐descent and conjugate‐gradient algorithms. Combining these two algorithms provides the best results because the steepest‐descent algorithm is more efficient and stable when far from the minimum (therefore, it brings the system to the neighborhood of the minimum quickly), whereas the conjugated‐gradient is much more efficient in close proximity to the minimum . Subsequently, an all‐atom MD simulation was performed with the AMBER FF99SB force field and the TIP3P water model .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the first step, the energy was minimized by the steepest‐descent and conjugate‐gradient algorithms. Combining these two algorithms provides the best results because the steepest‐descent algorithm is more efficient and stable when far from the minimum (therefore, it brings the system to the neighborhood of the minimum quickly), whereas the conjugated‐gradient is much more efficient in close proximity to the minimum . Subsequently, an all‐atom MD simulation was performed with the AMBER FF99SB force field and the TIP3P water model .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many researchers believe that the FR, DY, CD, PR, HS, and LS will behave differently when the function is non-quadratic and the exact line search is used (Shi and Guo [37], Yuan and Wei [6], Shi et al [38], and Dai [36]). In fact, in this study we show that the behaviour of these methods could be divided into two groups as shown by the performance profile.…”
Section: Nomentioning
confidence: 98%
“…For good references of CG methods with significant findings, please refer to Hager and Zhang [28], Sun and Zhang [11], Birgin and Martinez [3], Dai and Yuan [33], Yuan and Wei [6], Andrei [23], Shi and Guo [37], and Wei et al [39]. For a good compilation and comparative study of newer CG methods, please refer to Andrei [22,24] and Rivaie et al [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The main reason is that it cannot guarantee the descent objective function values at each iteration (Hager and Zhang [11]). For further reading and recent finding of CG methods, please refer to Sun and Zhang [21], Birgin and Matrtinez [4], Dai and Yuan [7], Yuan and Wei [23], Andrei [3], Shi and Gao [20] and Mustafa. et.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%