2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2008.09.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new experimental approach for obtaining diffuse-strain flow stress curves

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(25 reference statements)
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Efforts have been proposed for determining the material stress-strain relationships at large strains using the hydraulic bulge test [17][18][19] and shear test [20]. Attempts also have been made to estimate the local stress and strains within diffused necks [21][22][23] with the use of Bridgman corrections [24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Efforts have been proposed for determining the material stress-strain relationships at large strains using the hydraulic bulge test [17][18][19] and shear test [20]. Attempts also have been made to estimate the local stress and strains within diffused necks [21][22][23] with the use of Bridgman corrections [24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most commonly used method to investigate the flow stress curve is uniaxial tensile test in which true stress-true strain curve is expressed in uniaxial stress state. However, maximum plastic strains obtained in uniaxial loading condition is not sufficient for most sheet metal forming simulation processes which involve biaxial state of stress [1][2][3][4][5]. Hydraulic bulge test is a comparative test method in which biaxial stress-strain curve could be attained.…”
Section: Biaxial Bulge Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 1950, a key theoretical pillar for the hydraulic bulge test was established by Hill [6]. In his study, Hill assumed a circular profile for the deforming work piece which allowed for the introduction of a closed form expression for the thickness at the pole region [5].…”
Section: Biaxial Bulge Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So the effective stress-effective strain curve obtained above cannot properly express the mechanical properties of the anisotropic material unless the effect of R-value is considered. Smith et al (2009) proposed a new bulge formulation based on 2D Hill48 anisotropic yield criterion with a plane stress assumption. Compared with other methods in determining the flow stress curve, such as cruciform-biaxial, torsion, shear and moment-curvature, the bulge test is more reliable for diffuse necking regions.…”
Section: Determination Of Flow Stress Curve For the Sheet Hydroforminmentioning
confidence: 99%