2016
DOI: 10.15866/irecos.v11i12.10922
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A New Evaluation Method for Mesh Segmentation Based on the Levenshtein Distance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, our research team proposed six quantitative evaluation metrics which are: WDC [29], WKD [30], WSSD [31], Dj3D [32], WOI [33], NWLD [34]. The proposed evaluation measures are based respectively on: The Dice's coefficient, the Kulczynski similarity index, Sokal -Sneath distance, The Jaro distance, the Ochiai index and the final one is based on the Levenshtein Distance.…”
Section: Fig 3 the Segmentation Results Of Different 3d Meshes Usinmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, our research team proposed six quantitative evaluation metrics which are: WDC [29], WKD [30], WSSD [31], Dj3D [32], WOI [33], NWLD [34]. The proposed evaluation measures are based respectively on: The Dice's coefficient, the Kulczynski similarity index, Sokal -Sneath distance, The Jaro distance, the Ochiai index and the final one is based on the Levenshtein Distance.…”
Section: Fig 3 the Segmentation Results Of Different 3d Meshes Usinmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is clear that the most critical challenge in this type of approach is how to segment a 3D object into meaningful parts. To determine which segmentation method we will use, we have evaluated different segmentation algorithms by using some of the recent evaluation methods proposed in the literature, which give an efficient quantitative evaluation by comparing the automatic segmentation with a set of ground truth segmentations instead of one to one comparison, these evaluation methods are: NWLD [23], WKD [24], WDC [25], WOI [26], WSSD [27], Dj3D [28] and the AEI [29]. Table 1 present for each segmentation method its average of the dissimilarity scores obtained for the entire database by using the cited evaluation methods.…”
Section: Our Proposed Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%