2008
DOI: 10.4161/hv.4.1.5069
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new DTPw-HBV/Hib vaccine: Immune memory after primary vaccination and booster dosing in the second year of life

Abstract: The response to booster vaccination at 15-18 months of age and the presence of immune memory in 10-month old children, primed with a new combined diphtheria-tetanus-hepatitis B-whole cell pertussis vaccine extemporaneously mixed with Haemophilus influenzae type b-tetanus toxoid conjugate (DTPw-HBV/Hib) from new antigen sources and containing 2.5 microg polyribosyl-ribitol-phosphate (PRP) was assessed. Primary vaccination with the new DTPw-HBV/Hib vaccine was immunogenic and of comparable tolerability to commer… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
3
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
3
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the anti-PRP GMC point estimate for the comparator DTPw-HB/Hib 2.5 vaccine (which, unlike the other 2 vaccines [ Tritanrix (tm)-HepB/ Hiberix (tm) and Zilbrix -Hib(tm)] used in this study, is not a WHO pre-qualified) vaccine [17,18] was significantly lower than for the full-content DTPw-HB/Hib. The results from this study agree with previous findings from the Philippines and Latina comparing a DTPw-HB/Hib 2.5 vaccine with the licensed vaccine [6,19] and support the observation that vaccines containing reduced amounts of PRP-tetanus toxoid conjugate generate effective antibody responses and immunological protection [16,7,20-26]. The responses to the other antigens of DTPw-HBV/Hib 2.5 [Kft] were also found to be within similar 95% confidence intervals as the other vaccines, in terms of seroprotection and vaccine response, further substantiating the non-inferiority of the DTPw-HBV/Hib 2.5 [Kft] vaccine to the two comparator vaccines.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…However, the anti-PRP GMC point estimate for the comparator DTPw-HB/Hib 2.5 vaccine (which, unlike the other 2 vaccines [ Tritanrix (tm)-HepB/ Hiberix (tm) and Zilbrix -Hib(tm)] used in this study, is not a WHO pre-qualified) vaccine [17,18] was significantly lower than for the full-content DTPw-HB/Hib. The results from this study agree with previous findings from the Philippines and Latina comparing a DTPw-HB/Hib 2.5 vaccine with the licensed vaccine [6,19] and support the observation that vaccines containing reduced amounts of PRP-tetanus toxoid conjugate generate effective antibody responses and immunological protection [16,7,20-26]. The responses to the other antigens of DTPw-HBV/Hib 2.5 [Kft] were also found to be within similar 95% confidence intervals as the other vaccines, in terms of seroprotection and vaccine response, further substantiating the non-inferiority of the DTPw-HBV/Hib 2.5 [Kft] vaccine to the two comparator vaccines.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The rate of local and general adverse events in this study is consistent with published data following DTPw booster vaccination 9 , 10 . Five subjects experienced febrile convulsion after vaccination.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The results are in line with previous studies of DTPw-HBV/Hib-low dose vaccines that showed good immunogenicity and anamnestic responses when infants were primed with Hib-TT conjugate vaccines containing reduced PRP. [21][22][23][24] The immune response in terms of seroprotection rates for diphtheria and tetanus was similar in both study groups one month after primary vaccination, while the percentage of subjects with seroprotective anti-HBs antibody concentrations and vaccine response to pertussis was significantly higher in the DTPw-HBV LT /Hib 2.5 group (non-overlapping 95% CIs). Thus, the lowering of thiomersal content did not have any adverse influence on the immunogenicity of the hepatitis and pertussis components of the combined vaccine.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%