2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2021.122985
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new dried blood spot LC-MS/MS method for therapeutic drug monitoring of palbociclib, ribociclib, and letrozole in patients with cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In previous studies, the appearance of carry-over has been observed mostly for ABE, PAL and RIB [ 17 , 19 , 22 ]. Multiple strategies have been proposed for its elimination, from stationary phase exchange [ 22 ], different needle wash solvents [ 17 , 18 , 22 , 34 , 35 ], linear range reduction [ 19 ] and additional gradient washing steps [ 17 , 28 , 34 , 35 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In previous studies, the appearance of carry-over has been observed mostly for ABE, PAL and RIB [ 17 , 19 , 22 ]. Multiple strategies have been proposed for its elimination, from stationary phase exchange [ 22 ], different needle wash solvents [ 17 , 18 , 22 , 34 , 35 ], linear range reduction [ 19 ] and additional gradient washing steps [ 17 , 28 , 34 , 35 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is the first method which provides full chromatographic separation of all six analytes of interest; demonstrates the applicability of three detectors, including a diode array detector, a fluorescence detector and a QTOF MS detector; and is simple, selective and affordable. As opposed to previously published bioanalytical methods, that either did not include all analytes [ 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 37 ] or did not analyze all six drugs in real patient samples [ 13 ], we applied our method to analyze all the drugs of interest in real patients, in a clinical TDM context and for clinical pharmacokinetic evaluation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Most studies reported an analytical run time (14 of 23) [19][20][21][25][26][27][28][29]33,34,[37][38][39]41 ranging from 2.3 to 8.5 minutes, and a sample preparation time (20 of 23), [19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30]33,34,[36][37][38][39][40][41] ranging from 80 to 160 minutes. However, the actual hands-on time was not revealed in any of the included studies.…”
Section: Sample Preparation Timementioning
confidence: 99%