1995
DOI: 10.1016/0967-0637(95)97154-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new depth-time equation for Sippican or TSK T-7, T-6 and T-4 expendable bathythermographs (XBT)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
118
0
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 148 publications
(121 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
118
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These bias corrections were used in addition to the common bias correction (Hanawa et al 1995) which is not time-varying. XBT biases are one of major sources of uncertainty in OHC estimation (Lyman et al 2010;Boyer et al 2016).…”
Section: Uncertainties In Global Mean Temperaturesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These bias corrections were used in addition to the common bias correction (Hanawa et al 1995) which is not time-varying. XBT biases are one of major sources of uncertainty in OHC estimation (Lyman et al 2010;Boyer et al 2016).…”
Section: Uncertainties In Global Mean Temperaturesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A study of Hanawa et al (1995), based on comparisons with CTDs, proposed a new fall-rate equation for some types of XBTs (T-4, T-6, T-7 and Deep Blue models). In 1995-1996 Sippican and TSK manufacturers implemented this new fall-rate equation.…”
Section: Xbt Bias Correctionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is observed that the depth deduction from the fall rate has significant error ($25 m at a depth of 800 m). Hanawa et al (1995), herein after referred as HN-95, critically examined the XBT depth errors of T5, T6 and T7 probes based on a large set of simultaneous XBT-CTD data from different oceanic regions of the world. They proposed a common depth-time equation for T5, T6 and T7 probes that reduces the mean error to less than 1 m in the depth range of 0-800 m. Since the HN-95 data set was not having any representation from Indian Ocean, Thadathil et al (1998), using the controlled XBT-CTD data set, considered the use of HN-95 equation for XBT data from Indian Ocean.…”
Section: Fall Ratementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Curve with ' * ' represents depth error existing in XBT data. Whereas curve with open circle represents residual depth error after correction using fall rate equation of Thadathil et al, 1998, filled circle represents same for fall rate equation of Hanawa et al, 1995. The value of element is missing.…”
Section: Data Query and Visualizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation