2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2016.05.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new decision support model for preanesthetic evaluation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this model, which may also accommodate nonveto conditions, the criteria weights are substituted by a capacity , which allows criteria interactions (positive/negative synergies) to be modeled. These two types of extensions are the subject of ongoing investigations (see Sobrie et al, ; Meyer and Olteanu, ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In this model, which may also accommodate nonveto conditions, the criteria weights are substituted by a capacity , which allows criteria interactions (positive/negative synergies) to be modeled. These two types of extensions are the subject of ongoing investigations (see Sobrie et al, ; Meyer and Olteanu, ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The interested reader will find in Sobrie et al. () a medical application of the MR‐Sort method in the domain of preanesthesia patient assessment; Sobrie et al. () also discuss the issue of interpretability of MR‐Sort models.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In this cohort, there was agreement in 75% and 58% of the ASA 1 and 2 patients respectively, with 25% of the ASA 1 group and 17% of the ASA 2 group subsequently given a higher classification. Computer models are now being developed that are capable of allocating a patient's ASA classification with over 90% accuracy . However, until such programs are routinely used in clinical practice, there will continue to be a wide variation in ASA assignments by individual anaesthetists, with the knock‐on effect of disagreement regarding what pre‐operative investigations are necessary.…”
Section: Categorisationmentioning
confidence: 99%