1994
DOI: 10.1016/0031-9201(94)90085-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new data bank for tidal gravity measurements (DB 92)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
33
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
2
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The formal error estimate of the FG5 instrument is about 1-2 gGal [Niebauer et al, 1995]. Intercomparisons made at the gravimeters is at the 1 gGal level [Klopping et al, 1997].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The formal error estimate of the FG5 instrument is about 1-2 gGal [Niebauer et al, 1995]. Intercomparisons made at the gravimeters is at the 1 gGal level [Klopping et al, 1997].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One method is to monitor the tides for a long period (2-3 years) and then use a well known tidal amplitude (e.g. O1) to calibrate the instrument [Melchior, 1994]. This method works well, however, it is very time consuming and one is ultimately tied to uncertainties in the tidal amplitude used to calibrate the instrument.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Schwiderski model (SCHW80) has been regarded for a long time in geophysics as a working standard for the calculation of the oceanic loading and attraction vector L (Melchior, 1994a). It is a numerical model that uses Laplace equations and includes oceanic loading, oceanic mass attraction and friction effects.…”
Section: Gravity Tide Residualsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the M 2 wave residual was practically zero. Melchior (1995) describes a new interpretation of the correlation found between the heat flow values and the tide residuals after reviewing and reanalyzing the original tide data of 300 stations (Melchior, 1994a). This review takes into account the objections raised by Rydelek et al (1991), removing sources of error, essentially the instrument calibration errors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation