2010
DOI: 10.1080/03115510903546152
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new crustacean clam shrimp (Spinicaudata: Eosestheriidae) from the Upper Triassic of Argentina and its importance for ‘conchostracan’ taxonomy

Abstract: A new species of a fossil crustacean clam shrimp (Spinicaudata: Eosestheriidae) Menucoestheria wichmanni is described from the lower Upper Triassic Vera Formation (Los Menucos Complex) in Rı´o Negro Province, southern Argentina. This discovery represents the first record of this family in the Triassic of Argentina and the southernmost record of South American Triassic 'conchostracans' (Spinicaudata). The new species shows close affinities with Middle Jurassic faunas from Antarctica and offers important data on… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The number of growth lines necessarily increases through ontogeny, so it is a poor character to demonstrate phylogenetic relationships. Therefore relationships among fossil taxa have been determined based on ornamentation of the carapace (e.g., Gallego, 2010); however, these characters have not yet been integrated with morphological study of extant carapaces. Ongoing work seeks to demonstrate the utility of carapace ornamentation as valid phylogenetic characters (Astrop and Hegna, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The number of growth lines necessarily increases through ontogeny, so it is a poor character to demonstrate phylogenetic relationships. Therefore relationships among fossil taxa have been determined based on ornamentation of the carapace (e.g., Gallego, 2010); however, these characters have not yet been integrated with morphological study of extant carapaces. Ongoing work seeks to demonstrate the utility of carapace ornamentation as valid phylogenetic characters (Astrop and Hegna, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10.2) also discussed scanning electron micrographs of the fossil spinicaudatans from the Crato Member and suggested that re-examination of Cyzicus (Lioestheria) codoensis was necessary to clarify its affi nities. Furthermore, several authors (Carvalho, 1993, Rohn & Cavalheiro, 1996Gallego & Martins-Neto, 2006;Gallego et al, 2010) have noted similarities between the Lower Cretaceous spinicaudatan faunas of northeast Brazil and those of Australia and West Africa.…”
Section: The Name Lioestheria Defi Nition and Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For more information about the use and meaning of the names "Conchostraca" and Diplostraca see recent contributions (e.g. Gallego, 2010;Tassi et al, in press), and consult the following references for fossil and extant forms (Fryer, 1987;Olesen, 1998;Stenderup et al, 2006;Martin & Davis, 2001;Shen, 2003Shen, , 2011Shen et al, 2006;Shen & Huang, 2008). In this paper, the term "clam shrimp" provides a useful collective common name for fossil and extant laevicaudatans, spinicaudatans, leaiids and estherielliids (Shen, pers.…”
Section: Systematic Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Vera Formation is mainly represented by brownish to yellowish conglomerates, white to greenish sandstones and reddish brown to red pelites, with which volcanic ashes, tuffs and tuffites, dacitic pyroclastic flow products and volcanic breccias are intercalated (Labudía & Bjerg, 2001; Labudía & Bjerg, 2005). Sedimentation took place mainly in alluvial plain, floodplain, ephemeral river and small lacustrine palaeoenvironments (Labudía & Bjerg, 2005), under seasonal climate condition with alternating periods of dry and wet conditions (Gallego, 2010). Sedimentary and volcaniclastic levels within the Vera Formation are characterized by a very rich palaeoflora, the so-called “ Dicroidium - type flora” (Stipanicic, 1967; Stipanicic & Methol, 1972; Artabe, 1985a; Artabe, 1985b; Labudía et al, 1995; Labudía & Bjerg, 2001; Labudía & Bjerg, 2005) and by an abundant tetrapod ichnofauna, preserved on sandstones with poorly sorted grains and with a variable content of tuffaceous breccias (Melchor & de Valais, 2006).…”
Section: Geological Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%