2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.engappai.2017.02.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new criterion to validate and improve the classification process of LAMDA algorithm applied to diesel engines

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The MAD parameter measures the similarity of a descriptor with the same descriptor in a class. To obtain the MADs are used probability density functions like the Gaussian function, which uses the average value of the descriptor j belonging to the class k (ρ k,j ) and its standard deviation σ k,j [30]:…”
Section: ) Marginal Adequacy Degree (Mad)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The MAD parameter measures the similarity of a descriptor with the same descriptor in a class. To obtain the MADs are used probability density functions like the Gaussian function, which uses the average value of the descriptor j belonging to the class k (ρ k,j ) and its standard deviation σ k,j [30]:…”
Section: ) Marginal Adequacy Degree (Mad)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering the continuous control action as u = u c , then replacing ( 34) in (33), it is obtained:…”
Section: A Continuous Control Actionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method, originally designed to work in the classification and clustering context, has focused on the identification of functional states of a system. Several works have focused on the identification of the functional state using LAMDA as tool [33]- [37]. Initially, the algorithm computes the Marginal Adequacy Degree (MAD), a parameter that measures the contribution of the descriptors of an object to each cluster/class, with fuzzy probability functions like the Binomial or Gaussian functions [34].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this reason, Model 3 was modified by increasing the number of engine cycles. When additional calculations were made for training sets, created as previously but containing averaged data from more engine cycles (15,20,25,30,35,40), the accuracy after 10-fold cross valida-tion (run once in each case) was 93.9%, 94.3%, 96.2%, 96.1%, 96.2%, and 94.3%, respectively. At the 50th run of 10-fold cross validation (with almost identical software, Linux counterpart C5.0), the averaged values amounted to 93.9%, 95.7%, 97.1%, 96.2%, 95.1%, and 93.1%, respectively.…”
Section: Application Of Decision Trees and Particle Swarm Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%