2013
DOI: 10.3399/bjgp13x667196
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new competency model for general practice: implications for selection, training, and careers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
106
0
3

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(112 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
106
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…However, Fones and colleagues found little difference in the rankings of desirable qualities made by those with a medical background compared to those without (Fones et al 1998). Patterson and colleagues investigated a competency model for general practitioners which included canvassing the views of patients (Patterson et al 2000). The only qualities identified exclusively by general practitioners (GPs) were qualities external to the patient consultation, such as 'managing others', 'political awareness' and 'learning and personal development'.…”
Section: Practice Pointsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, Fones and colleagues found little difference in the rankings of desirable qualities made by those with a medical background compared to those without (Fones et al 1998). Patterson and colleagues investigated a competency model for general practitioners which included canvassing the views of patients (Patterson et al 2000). The only qualities identified exclusively by general practitioners (GPs) were qualities external to the patient consultation, such as 'managing others', 'political awareness' and 'learning and personal development'.…”
Section: Practice Pointsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the innovations made in processes and methods for medical student selection (Eva et al 2004), inconsistent terminology is used to describe conceptually similar qualities. For example, some studies identify the quality of 'integrity' (Patterson et al 2000), while others identify 'honesty' (Fones et al 1998). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10 When comparing all three selection methods, the best prediction of end-oftraining competence is a combination of all three methods (combining both lowand high-fidelity assessments), as each adds something unique in predicting job performance and training outcomes.…”
Section: Discussion Summarymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Trainees in a GP placement were specifically targeted, rather than those entering training in a hospital environment, as the selection criteria identified from the original job analysis study were tailored specifically for general practice. 10 Clinical supervisors (n = 196) evaluated the registrars' performance on the six target attributes, using a 24-item inventory adapted from the original validation study. An example item for coping with pressure was 'is clear and rational when dealing with difficult issues or situations'.…”
Section: Design and Samplingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many studies add that in addition to its positive implications on patient retention and loyalty, patient satisfaction influences the rate of patient compliance with physician advice and the healing process of patients (Calnan, 1988;Roter, Hall, & Katz, 1987). A competency model for general practice, comprising implications for selection, training, and development (Patterson, Ferguson, Lane, Farrell, Martlew, & Wells, 2000), suggests that effective communication is crucial to the medical job role, in general, and for general practice, in particular.…”
Section: Background and Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%