2015
DOI: 10.3390/f6051696
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A New Collaborative Methodology for Assessment and Management of Ecosystem Services

Abstract: Abstract:Collaborative management is a new framework to help implement programmes in protected areas. Within this context, the aim of this work is twofold. First, to propose a robust methodology to implement collaborative management focused on ecosystem services. Second, to develop indicators for the main functions of ecosystem services. Decision makers, technical staff and other stakeholders are included in the process from the beginning, by identifying ecosystem services and eliciting preferences using the A… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…could be taken into consideration in a future improvement of the paper with the use of the AHP, for the calculation of the different weights of the heavy metals. The combination of AHP and PROMETHE was used in a case study in Spain in the forestry-environmental area, for the assessment of ecosystems services, taking into consideration the views of the implicated stakeholders (Segura et al, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…could be taken into consideration in a future improvement of the paper with the use of the AHP, for the calculation of the different weights of the heavy metals. The combination of AHP and PROMETHE was used in a case study in Spain in the forestry-environmental area, for the assessment of ecosystems services, taking into consideration the views of the implicated stakeholders (Segura et al, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One reason for this is that the establishment of the protected area cannot be effective by itself if it is not combined with other external plans such as land use planning [54]. In addition, it does not provide tools for prioritizing management alternatives which simultaneously consider the value of ES [55]. This is further compounded by the lack of conservation programs sharing benefits among different stakeholders.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding ES evaluation, different studies have used ranking approaches as a tool to evaluate ES. Segura et al [28] applied a PROMETHEE-based method to obtain new composite indicators for provisioning, maintenance and "direct to citizen services". Fontana et al [29] have used PROMETHEE to compare land use alternatives considering ES as criteria.…”
Section: Choice Of the Mcda Methods Promethee IImentioning
confidence: 99%