1982
DOI: 10.1192/bjp.140.6.566
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A New Clinical Scale for the Staging of Dementia

Abstract: Accurate clinical staging of dementia in older subjects has not previously been achieved despite the use of such methods as psychometric testing, behavioural rating, and various combinations of simpler psychometric and behavioural evaluations. The Clinical Dementia Rating (CRD), a global rating device, was developed for a prospective study of mild senile dementia--Alzheimer type (SDAT). Reliability, validity, and correlational data are discussed. The CRD was found to distinguish unambiguously among older subje… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

15
4,232
0
117

Year Published

1986
1986
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6,270 publications
(4,436 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
15
4,232
0
117
Order By: Relevance
“…The inclusionary and exclusionary criteria for DAT are consistent with the NINCDS-ADRDA criteria (McKhann et al, 1984). The severity of dementia was staged according to the Washington University Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) scale (Berg, 1988;Hughes, Berg, Danziger, Coben, & Martin, 1982;Morris, 1993). According to this scale, CDR 0, 0.5, 1, 2, and 3 represent no dementia, very mild dementia, mild dementia, moderate dementia, and severe dementia, respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The inclusionary and exclusionary criteria for DAT are consistent with the NINCDS-ADRDA criteria (McKhann et al, 1984). The severity of dementia was staged according to the Washington University Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) scale (Berg, 1988;Hughes, Berg, Danziger, Coben, & Martin, 1982;Morris, 1993). According to this scale, CDR 0, 0.5, 1, 2, and 3 represent no dementia, very mild dementia, mild dementia, moderate dementia, and severe dementia, respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patients were rated with a series of standardized diagnostic and severity instruments, including the MMSE (Folstein et al, 1975), the Clinical Dementia Rating Scale (CDRS; Hughes et al, 1982), the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS, Yesavage et al, 1982), the Hachinski Ischemic Scale (Rosen et al, 1980), and the Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL, Lawton and Brodie, 1969). In addition, patients underwent diagnostic neuroimaging procedures (head computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)) and laboratory testing to rule out other causes of dementia.…”
Section: Diagnostic Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…17,18 Their caregivers were also questioned for the presence of sociopathic acts on the basis of a modification of a criterion for antisocial personality disorder, 19 that is, “failure to conform to social norms with respect to lawful behaviors, as indicated by performing an act that brought him/her to legal attention.” For the patients identified as having sociopathic behavior, medical records were reviewed for evidence that they were not in a confusional state or delirium and knew what they were doing at the time of the actual events or sociopathic acts.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%