2003
DOI: 10.1093/ageing/32.3.252
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new classification of higher level gait disorders in patients with cerebral multi-infarct states

Abstract: it is suggested, though not proven, that patients with Ignition Apraxia could have problems with internal cueing due to lesions in the supplementary motor area or its connections whereas those with Equilibrium Apraxia could have dysfunction predominantly in the pre-motor area and its connections.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
57
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
4
57
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This finding is consistent with epidemiological data linking even mild cerebrovascular disease with mobility impairment (33).…”
Section: © 2 0 1 0 E D I T R I C E K U R T I S F O R P E R S O N a supporting
confidence: 93%
“…This finding is consistent with epidemiological data linking even mild cerebrovascular disease with mobility impairment (33).…”
Section: © 2 0 1 0 E D I T R I C E K U R T I S F O R P E R S O N a supporting
confidence: 93%
“…1 It increases the risk of falls, functional decline, and death. [1][2][3] Cerebral multi-infarct states can lead to variously labeled gait disorders (eg, vascular parkinsonism, frontal gait disorder, and "marche à petits pas"), 4 but the contribution of vascular risk factors to the etiology of age-related gait changes (eg, in speed) has received less attention.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gait disturbances in the early stage after VP shunt fell under the frontal gait disorder of Nutt's classification or the mixed gait apraxia of Liston's classification 10) (Tables 2 and 3). Disequilibrium clearly improved gradually after VP shunt, however, gait ignition failure and hypokinesia did not improve significantly in our study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%