2019
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-52786-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A New Chloroplast DNA Extraction Protocol Significantly Improves the Chloroplast Genome Sequence Quality of Foxtail Millet (Setaria italica (L.) P. Beauv.)

Abstract: The complexity of the leaf constitution of foxtail millet (Setaria italica (L.) P. Beauv.) makes it difficult to obtain high-purity cpDNA. Here, we developed a protocol to isolate high-quality cpDNA from foxtail millet and other crops. The new protocol replaces previous tissue grinding and homogenization by enzyme digestion of tiny leaf strips to separate protoplasts from leaf tissue and protects chloroplasts from damage by undue grinding and homogenization and from contamination of cell debris and nuclear DNA… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some maize plastid genomes are publicly available, including one partial ancient genome (SM10) [ 19 ], four Zea species, the subspecie Zea mays subsp. huehuetenangensis (Iltis & Doebley) Doebley, 1990 [ 20 ], and several domesticated maize lines including ‘B73’ [ 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 ], ‘B37’ (C, T, S, N), ‘A188’ [ 22 ], and ‘Zhengdan958’ [ 23 ]. Additionally, the plastid genomes of the close relatives Tripsacum dactyloides (L.) L [ 24 ] and Sorgum bicolor (L.) Moench [ 17 ] are also available.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some maize plastid genomes are publicly available, including one partial ancient genome (SM10) [ 19 ], four Zea species, the subspecie Zea mays subsp. huehuetenangensis (Iltis & Doebley) Doebley, 1990 [ 20 ], and several domesticated maize lines including ‘B73’ [ 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 ], ‘B37’ (C, T, S, N), ‘A188’ [ 22 ], and ‘Zhengdan958’ [ 23 ]. Additionally, the plastid genomes of the close relatives Tripsacum dactyloides (L.) L [ 24 ] and Sorgum bicolor (L.) Moench [ 17 ] are also available.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regular DNA extraction protocols such as CTAB [ 76 ] and SDS [ 77 ] result in total cellular DNA, including genomic, chloroplast, and mitochondrial DNA. However, there are protocols available for additional enrichment of chloroplast DNA, including plastid isolation, enrichment via methylation-sensitive capture, hybrid bait capture, and PCR [ 78 , 79 ]. Nevertheless, these isolation or enrichment procedures are time-consuming and expensive [ 80 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Owing to the development of sequencing methods and the decreasing costs of genome sequencing, the barcode concept can be extended from one or more genes to the entire genome (Coissac et al, 2016). The chloroplast genome is easily obtained using PCR enrichment (Dong et al, 2013), direct isolation (Shi et al, 2012; Liu et al, 2019), or skimming of genomic DNA (Zeng et al, 2018) compared with nuclear and mitochondrial genomes. The chloroplast genome contained as much variation as the COI locus in animals and many studies have argued for it as the plant super‐barcode (Hollingsworth et al, 2016; Fu et al, 2019; Ji et al, 2019; Shen et al, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%