1990
DOI: 10.1097/00005373-199005000-00003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A New Characterization of Injury Severity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
169
0
21

Year Published

1992
1992
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 353 publications
(191 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
169
0
21
Order By: Relevance
“…8 These codes represent minor injuries, such as superficial wounds and minor orthopedic injuries, that have been found not to contribute significantly to mortality predictions. 8 Burns and burn-related injuries were also excluded from the reclassification scheme, as the predictive model was not intended to estimate severity of burns nor predict burn mortality. A list of the injury categories and their corresponding ICD-9-CM codes can be found in Table 1.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…8 These codes represent minor injuries, such as superficial wounds and minor orthopedic injuries, that have been found not to contribute significantly to mortality predictions. 8 Burns and burn-related injuries were also excluded from the reclassification scheme, as the predictive model was not intended to estimate severity of burns nor predict burn mortality. A list of the injury categories and their corresponding ICD-9-CM codes can be found in Table 1.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 Since then, there have been numerous attempts to develop a scoring system that can accurately reflect the severity of a patient's injuries, particularly with respect to the effect of those injuries on survival. [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9] However, these scoring systems have attributes that limit their ability to reliably predict mortality. First, there is often a loss of information.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Injury Severity Score (ISS) [13] and the New Injury Severity Score (NISS) [14] were used to define the severity of trauma. The Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation, APACHE II [15] score, was used to evaluate the overall physiological impairment of the patient.…”
Section: Trauma Scoring Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[12] The RTS is largely dependent on the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), which is influenced by cranial trauma. [13] The TRISS reflects the possibility of survival and is calculated using the ISS, RTS, and age of the subject. [14] In a study conducted by Hanna et al [7] that focused on which factors increased mortality rates, the authors found that an ISS of >15 and traumatic cranial damage were the culprits.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%