2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00259-019-04596-x
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new Centiloid method for 18F-florbetaben and 18F-flutemetamol PET without conversion to PiB

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
34
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
2
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The concordance rates of Aβ positivity among 18 F-ligands have not yet been extensively evaluated in direct comparison studies. However, the results of the present study were supported by our previous work showing the spatial distribution of increased FMM uptake was similar to FBB [18]. In addition, FMM and FBB were highly correlated (R 2 = 0.97) and showed similar dynamic ranges (slope = 0.99).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The concordance rates of Aβ positivity among 18 F-ligands have not yet been extensively evaluated in direct comparison studies. However, the results of the present study were supported by our previous work showing the spatial distribution of increased FMM uptake was similar to FBB [18]. In addition, FMM and FBB were highly correlated (R 2 = 0.97) and showed similar dynamic ranges (slope = 0.99).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…FMM is the 18 F-labelled analogue of 11 C-PiB and shows strong concordance with histopathology for brain brillar Aβ. FMM has been useful for differentiating cognitively normal people and AD patients with high speci city and sensitivity in detection of AD [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 58%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In this study, we investigated which reference regions are most appropriate to calculate CL unit when using the FBB and FMM ligands. We used head-to-head comparisons of Aβ PET with the FBB and FMM ligands using a direct comparison of the FBB-FMM CL (dcCL) method 11 with four reference regions: CG, WC, WC + B, and pons, which have been frequently used in previous studies. We hypothesized that we would find differences in the appropriateness of the different reference regions between FBB and FMM in terms of the largest effect size between the AD and YC groups and the smallest variability within the YC group.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%