2015
DOI: 10.1002/2015gc005931
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new bathymetry of the Northeast Greenland continental shelf: Constraints on glacial and other processes

Abstract: RESEARCH ARTICLE 10.1002/2015GC005931A new bathymetry of the Northeast Greenland continental shelf: Constraints on glacial and other processes (748N-818N) is presented. The DBM has a grid cell size of 250 m 3 250 m and incorporates bathymetric data from 30 multibeam cruises, more than 20 single-beam cruises and first reflector depths from industrial seismic lines. The new DBM substantially improves the bathymetry compared to older models. The DBM not only allows a better delineation of previously known seaflo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
105
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(107 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
2
105
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The continental shelf of Northeast Greenland is a good example, in which swath-bathymetric evidence of a combination of subglacially produced MSGLs and transverse-to-flow icemarginal retreat moraines demonstrated for the first time that ice of probable LGM age had covered much of the 250 km-wide shelf (e.g. Evans et al 2009;Winkelmann et al 2010;Arndt et al 2015). This compelling submarine geomorphic evidence helped replace an earlier view, based on limited terrestrial Quaternary evidence from the Northeast Greenland coast, that LGM ice had not been much more extensive there than during interglacials (e.g.…”
Section: Volume and Time Frame For Formation Of Submarine Glacial Lanmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The continental shelf of Northeast Greenland is a good example, in which swath-bathymetric evidence of a combination of subglacially produced MSGLs and transverse-to-flow icemarginal retreat moraines demonstrated for the first time that ice of probable LGM age had covered much of the 250 km-wide shelf (e.g. Evans et al 2009;Winkelmann et al 2010;Arndt et al 2015). This compelling submarine geomorphic evidence helped replace an earlier view, based on limited terrestrial Quaternary evidence from the Northeast Greenland coast, that LGM ice had not been much more extensive there than during interglacials (e.g.…”
Section: Volume and Time Frame For Formation Of Submarine Glacial Lanmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By informing the mouth elevation on IBCAO observational data at a distance of ∼ 20 km from the mouth, the impact of using distant bathymetric observation is exemplified. Equally, as many fjords have at least some information following various recent campaigns (including Schjøth et al, 2012;Dowdeswell et al, 2014;Arndt et al, 2015;Rignot et al, 2016), the use of observational data to constrain the algorithm is illustrated by SynthOBS. The application of these two synthetic approaches has provided bathymetry more representative of the observed elevation profiles (OBS1516) of fjords within the area of interest (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, observations for the fjord mouth could be taken from datasets including IBCAO or others (e.g. Schjøth et al, 2012;Dowdeswell et al, 2014;Arndt et al, 2015;Rignot et al, 2016); however these values may be at a significant distance from the fjord mouth itself, which using the presented approach may result in further under-or overestimation of a given fjord centreline elevation profile.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The publication of different datasets is continuously improving the bathymetry around Greenland (e.g., Arndt et al, 2015;Fenty et al, 2016;Rignot et al, 2015Rignot et al, , 2016Schumann et al, 2012;Williams et al, 2017), even if it is only based on a suite of single-point observations (Andresen et al, 2014) or inversion of gravity data to obtain bathymetry (Porter et al, 2014). Whereas the topography of the onshore area is more easily determined from air and satellite imagery and altimetry (e.g., Korsgaard et al, 2016;Willis et al, 2015), the relief of the submarine parts is hidden by the water column and can only be determined with hydroacoustic methods or aerial gravimetry.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%