2006
DOI: 10.1785/0120050138
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A New Attenuation Relation for Strong Ground Motion in Japan Based on Recorded Data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

6
253
2
5

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 359 publications
(266 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
6
253
2
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Five [Atkinson and Boore, 2003, Crouse, 1991, García et al, 2005, Lin and Lee, 2008, McVerry et al, 2006 out of the eight selected models are ranked in the lowest capability class (D) by the method of Scherbaum et al [2004] and only one model, that of Kanno et al [2006], is ranked higher than C. The results for the GMPEs of Atkinson and Boore [2003], Crouse [1991] and Youngs et al [1997] are in agreement with those presented by Douglas et al [2006] based on their smaller dataset.…”
Section: Data Selectedsupporting
confidence: 65%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Five [Atkinson and Boore, 2003, Crouse, 1991, García et al, 2005, Lin and Lee, 2008, McVerry et al, 2006 out of the eight selected models are ranked in the lowest capability class (D) by the method of Scherbaum et al [2004] and only one model, that of Kanno et al [2006], is ranked higher than C. The results for the GMPEs of Atkinson and Boore [2003], Crouse [1991] and Youngs et al [1997] are in agreement with those presented by Douglas et al [2006] based on their smaller dataset.…”
Section: Data Selectedsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…It was decided to update the analysis of Douglas et al [2006] for this type of earthquake for a number of reasons: a) the number of available strong-motion records from subduction earthquakes from this region is about double that available when Douglas et al [2006] compiled data from this region; b) many records from a large (M w 7.4) intraslab earthquakes that occurred in 2007 improved the distribution with respect to magnitude and distance; and c) a number of new GMPEs for subduction earthquakes have been published and hence can be compared to the observations. One of the most important findings is that the recent ground-motion models developed from Japanese data [Kanno et al, 2006, Zhao et al, 2006 provide quite good predictions of observed earthquake ground motions and their variabilities in the Lesser Antilles. Other recent GMPEs derived for Mexico [García et al, 2005], Taiwan [Lin and Lee, 2008] and New Zealand [McVerry et al, 2006] are ranked poorly by the method of Scherbaum et al [2004] for this dataset.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations