1985
DOI: 10.1016/s0040-4020(01)96543-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new aromaticity index and its application to five-membered ring heterocycles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
209
0
8

Year Published

1995
1995
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 440 publications
(226 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
5
209
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been found that equation (5), which is similar to that (3) proposed for rHOMA, can be applied for the modified index. For the system containing the even number of bonds (2i), i.e., the same number of single (i) and double (i) bonds, the normalization α constant can be calculated from equation (4) proposed for the rHOMA index.…”
Section: Homed Indexmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…It has been found that equation (5), which is similar to that (3) proposed for rHOMA, can be applied for the modified index. For the system containing the even number of bonds (2i), i.e., the same number of single (i) and double (i) bonds, the normalization α constant can be calculated from equation (4) proposed for the rHOMA index.…”
Section: Homed Indexmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…117,118 In 1983, Jug suggested that aromaticity could be measured by the minimal bond order in a given ring structure 119 and, two years afterwards, Bird defined a new measure of aromaticity based on the statistical deviation of the bond orders in the ring. 120 More recently, Matta et al 121 and…”
Section: Electron Delocalisation Measures As Indicators Of Aromaticitymentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The aromaticity indices 15 (Bird, 1985) and HOMA (Gdaniec, Turowska-Tyrk & Krygowski, 1989) are 67.9 and 0.823, respectively for unsubstituted imidazole [structural data for these calculations are from McMullan, Epstein, Ruble & Craven (1979)]. [Note that in the original publication (Bird, 1985), 15 for imidazole is calculated from data corrected for libration and is 64.] The title compounds have smaller values: 61.3 and 0.565 for (I) and 64.2 and 0.664 for (II).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%