None of the compounds has H atoms which are able to form hydrogen bonds. Neither the imidazole nor the phenyl rings are stacked. The aromaticity indices 15 (Bird, 1985) and HOMA (Gdaniec, Turowska-Tyrk & Krygowski, 1989) are 67.9 and 0.823, respectively for unsubstituted imidazole [structural data for these calculations are from McMullan, Epstein, Ruble & Craven (1979)]. [Note that in the original publication (Bird, 1985), 15 for imidazole is calculated from data corrected for libration and is 64.] The title compounds have smaller values: 61.3 and 0.565 for (I) and 64.2 and 0.664 for (II). The observed angles between the least-squares planes of the imidazole and phenyl rings are similar to those found in other 1-arylimidazoles (Ishihara et al., 1992) and represent the compromise between the crystal packing and the minimum energy position, which was found by MOPAC (Quantum Chemistry Program Exchange No. 455) calculations at 90 ° (using default settings; rotation of the phenyl group around the N1--C4 bond with C5 and C9 related by symmetry).
AbstractThe two title compounds, CIoH9N302, (I), and CllHll-N302, (II), are monomers. No intermolecular interactions are observed. The angle between the planes of the phenyl and imidazole rings is 51.2 (6) in (I) and 53.9 (5) ° in (lI). The nitro groups are twisted with respect to the imidazole tings by 3.2 (5) and 3.7 (5) ° in (I) and (II), respectively.