2017
DOI: 10.1111/1748-8583.12141
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new argument using embeddedness and sensemaking to explain small firms' responses to employment regulation

Abstract: In this essay, we develop a new argument about how the concept of embeddedness and a sensemaking approach can be used to theorise small firms' regulatory responses, especially to employment regulation. We want to move beyond the simplistic and narrow conceptualisations of resistant action in small firms in response to regulation. We contribute to theorising on small firms' regulatory responses by developing an embedded account of social action that takes us beyond the dichotomy of individualised (micro) and in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 85 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In-depth, qualitative studies are required to more fully explore the indirect effects of regulations and how regulations interact with other forms of influence. Recently, steps to understand regulations and the responses of small businesses situated in particular contexts have been proposed by Mayson and Barrett (2017). Drawing on Uzzi (1997) and incorporating Weick's work on sensemaking, Mayson and Barrett (2017) 'seek to explain why adaptation occurs and how it does ' (p. 191).…”
Section: Methodological Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In-depth, qualitative studies are required to more fully explore the indirect effects of regulations and how regulations interact with other forms of influence. Recently, steps to understand regulations and the responses of small businesses situated in particular contexts have been proposed by Mayson and Barrett (2017). Drawing on Uzzi (1997) and incorporating Weick's work on sensemaking, Mayson and Barrett (2017) 'seek to explain why adaptation occurs and how it does ' (p. 191).…”
Section: Methodological Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, steps to understand regulations and the responses of small businesses situated in particular contexts have been proposed by Mayson and Barrett (2017). Drawing on Uzzi (1997) and incorporating Weick's work on sensemaking, Mayson and Barrett (2017) 'seek to explain why adaptation occurs and how it does ' (p. 191). To achieve this, Mayson and Barrett propose a research methodology that appreciates a business's context and is centred on interviewing owner-managers.…”
Section: Methodological Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the neglect of the SME sector and the lack of theory building in this field, a number of scholars have made contributions when theorising how SMEs are influenced by regulations. For example, Mayson and Barrett (2017) brought the concepts of embedddness and sensemaking together to explain small firms' regulatory responses. Their approach highlights that heterogeneous responses made by owner-managers are dependent upon how they make sense of the internal and external situatedness.…”
Section: Theories On Firms' Regulatory Responsesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is generally advanced that matters such as employment legislation is burdensome to smaller businesses, that is restricting expansion or constraining entrepreneurial innovation because of 'red-tape' or costly bureaucracy (Hann, 2012). However, Mayson and Barrett (2017) advance that such an argument is limiting. It is not necessarily true or generalizable that regulation is somehow inevitably all-constraining to all smaller firms.…”
Section: Table 92 About Here: People Management Strategies In Large mentioning
confidence: 99%